This article contains information explaining aspects of the situation with the Los Angeles wildfires, where the federal, state and local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the situation, including through their withholding of fire mitigation procedures and through leftist Antifa-type terrorists setting the fires.
It is explained that the motivation for causing the fires is to destroy neighborhoods in order to rebuild by implementing a UN Agenda 21 “smart city,” among other reasons.
Also explained are the ridiculous “woke” agendas of the Los Angeles Fire department, how the LA’s mayor Karen Bass is a Marxist Communist, and how leftists are attempting to blame the fires on supposed “global warming.”
Video: Alex Jones explains how the federal, state & local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the worst fires in Los Angeles history
Alex Jones explains much proof that the federal, state, and local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the fires that are occurring in Los Angeles which are the worse in its history, where it is being done by design in order to help implement the UN’s Agenda 21 which is intended to collapse society and create a totalitarian post-industrial world.
Following are points made in the video:
— Donald Trump has been accusing Governor Newsom of “incompetence” with his handling of the fire, however the reality is more insidious where the truth is that the fires are premeditated sabotage as a war on the people.
— In addition to arsonists starting fires (spoken about more in detail on another video on this article), electricity to power lines was often not turned off in order to create additional fires where they fell.
— LA is claiming that they have lost control of their emergency alert system.
— LA announced in late December 2024 that they had suspended the annual testing of the fire hydrants for the fiscal year of 2024.
— A reservoir in the Palisades that holds 117 million gallons of water was empty and offline for maintenance.
— Insurance companies pulled out of the area in the last few months, where they dropped the policies of many California homeowners, citing the fact that there wasn’t enough fire mitigation being implemented by the city such as the brush not adequately being cut. [Note: How can they be allowed to do that? It’s not the property owner’s fault. The companies should have sued the city and state instead.]
— The U.S. Forest Service had ceased prescribed burns in California, ridiculously claiming it was a “precautionary measure” to ensure the availability of staff and equipment for potential real wildfires.
— Homeowners whose houses have been destroyed that no longer have fire insurance will be expected to sell their properly for pennies on the dollar through the implementation of eminent domain, in order empower planned totalitarian “smart cities.”
— Big environmental preserves that are close to the cities have been spared from the fires due to proper planning and fire management, being locations where globalist billionaires have their own easements where they live in lavish mansions.
— Gavin Newsom cut $100 million from the California fire prevention budget, where the budget of every local fire department was reduced by 20% and the money was given to empower corrupt leftist agendas, such as being sent to Ukraine.
— Is had been widely reported last year that necessary brush inspections in the area have lagged.
— Despite neglecting to spend money on fire prevention, the state spends enormous amounts of money on welfare for illegal aliens. It is estimated that the yearly federal expenditures for such welfare including hospital bills is more than $150 billion.
— Establishment figures such as Klaus Schwab, King Charles, and Gretta Thunberg have been claiming that man-made climate change is the cause of the fires, where they been using it as an excuse to implement their society-destroying globalist agendas.
— Previously in Maui, Hawaii, it was proposed to implement “smart city” agendas but it wasn’t accepted, so a year later Maui was burned to the ground. The same is also now happening in Los Angeles due to a “SmartLA 2028” agenda that is being planned to be implemented.
— Biden is pledging 100% federal aid for the fires by claiming it is being caused by climate change, thus making the entire country pay the bill for the California Democrat’s intentional fires.
— Antifa-type leftists who are starting the fires are motivated by “class envy,” where they hate people who have even a little more money than they do. The political Establishment channels the energy of such lazy degenerates in society and gives them power over others in order to exploit their shortcomings as a weapon.
— Such an agenda of the global elite is called “scorched Earth,” which has been implemented throughout history such as when Russia burned St. Petersburg to the ground in order to deprive Napoleon of the city when he invaded.
— The part of LA that is being burned out is one of the most expensive areas, where it borders areas where generally poor people live who are not willing to sell their property.
— Historically in the U.S. when mineral strikes and fossil fuels were discovered near populated areas the elite would come in and burn the towns down, including killing the inhabitants, such as what happened in Pinkerton, Colorado in 1914. (link)
— Footage is shown of Kalus Shwab giving a speech in the United Arab Emirates where he said people in Los Angeles will use Uber-like apps to summon self-driving cars, where by 2030 Los Angeles will be free of privately driven cars, which will “allow to transform highways into parks and public spheres.”
— In the 2023 / 2024 Los Angeles budget they had a surplus of funds for firefighting, and in 2024 / 2025 a surplus also existed, however the money was allocated elsewhere in order to empower corrupt leftist agendas.
— Gavin Newsom is incredibly corrupt. Democrat cities and Democrat states are all bankrupt and they are dragging down the rest of the country, such as what California is doing with its use of federal emergency funds. Those areas must be liberated or they will bring the entire country down.
Video: Arsonists are confirmed to have set multiple fires that led to the Los Angeles wildfires, while state & federal Democrats blocked fire mitigation to ensure the firestorm’s success
Following is a description of the video:
Alex Jones explains that the fires in Los Angeles are the result of arson, where all of the fire mitigation programs have intentionally been removed and the fires are being started by leftist Antifa-type environmental terrorists.
Jones mentions the UN’s “Rewilding project” that was put into treaties in 1992, (link and link) where some of its goals are to eliminate farming, get rid of coal powered plants, and cut off access to water.
Federal, State and Local authorities who are operating under such UN regulations are intentionally eliminating fire mitigation programs, which Donald Trump has criticized in the past.
Firebreaks would be easy and inexpensive to create, and they could also be used as access roads by people, which the UN does not like. Biden has also been blocking controlled burns over the past few years.
The Mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass who is overseeing the destruction of the city is a card-carrying Communist who has been working for Cuba.
Many people who are involved in the harmful activities that are occurring are compartmentalized and they don’t understand the big picture of what is happening.
The political Establishment has been removing all of the necessary services that stabilize civilization in order to usher in their totalitarian post-industrial world, such as by compromising the supply of food, water, energy, medicine, education, culture, turning off the infrastructure, and defunding the police; while at the same time they are increasing taxes.
The Establishment has also been encouraging woke identity politics mentalities in people for the ulterior motive of setting a precedent to discriminate, such as through the upcoming social credit score system.
What is happening is an admitted administrative shutdown of civilization in order to trigger a collapse and depopulate the planet.
Video: The Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass is a card-carrying Marxist Communist
[Note a video that is included in this episode contains a strange anti-Christian expletive embedded within it. All of the information in this video is summarized below.]
This video explains that the seemingly ridiculously incompetent Mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass is actually a card-carrying Marxist Communist who has a decades-long history of being involved with a Cuban Marxist terrorist group known as “the Venceremos Brigade,” which was used to subvert American interests, weaken democracies, and spread Communism around the world.
It is explained that the group attracted the most radicalized and delusional segments of American leftists starting in the 1960’s, where all of its members were required to be Marxist-Leninists, and it trained its members in terrorist tactics and guerrilla warfare including making bombs.
Also mentioned is an all-woman domestic terrorist group known as M-19 that was also radicalized by the Venceremos Brigade. M-19 was founded in 1978 and it robbed armored trucks, abetted prison breaks, bombed an FBI office, bombed the Israel Aircraft Industries building, bombed the African Consulate in New York, bombed Fort McNair in Washington D.C., and it bombed the north wing of the U.S. Capitol building.
Karen Bass who is now Mayor of Los Angeles actually led the South Los Angeles Venceremos Brigade.
The political Establishment has been attempting to blame the Los Angeles fires on global warming
Joe Biden’s excuse for bailing out the cost of the fires using federal funds is because he is blaming it on “global warming.” (link) See this article that explains how the supposed man-caused climate change issue is a corrupt hoax.
See the following articles:
An Infowars article explains that the FEMA chief is claiming that climate change is to blame for the California wildfires (link)
A Breitbart article explains that the Democrat Massachusetts Senator Ed Markley is claiming that the Los Angeles fires are the result of a climate change “disaster” stoked by Trump’s embrace of “big oil” (link)
Politico disinformation article: “‘Half the Country’s Thinking Magically’: California Fire Victims Grapple with the Political Paralysis Over Climate Change” (link)
Democracy Now disinformation article: “Climate Scientist Peter Kalmus Fled L.A. Fearing Wildfires. His Old Neighborhood Is Now a Hellscape” (link)
Truthdig disinformation article: “Yes, Human-Caused Climate Change Contributed to the Burning of Los Angeles” (link)
Mother Jones disinformation article: “What We’re Missing About the Cause of the LA Wildfires” (link)
Images from mapsland.com and Wikipedia.
In a manner that is unfortunately typical of Donald Trump’s annoying “gaffes,” he said that he was not going to rule out the use of military force to acquire Greenland and the Panama Canal for the U.S., which of course the media has been reporting about by portraying him as being an “irrational out of control authoritarian.” However such a response seems to be what Trump was intending to happen.
As reported in this AP article, Trump said about the matter:
“‘I’m not going to commit to that,’ Trump said, when asked if he would rule out the use of the military. ‘It might be that you’ll have to do something. The Panama Canal is vital to our country.’ He added, ‘We need Greenland for national security purposes.’
Even some Establishment media outlets are conceding that Trump’s hostile statement is only “bluster” that shouldn’t be taken seriously, for example this BBC article speculates that his intention is likely only to get Denmark to boost Greenland’s security in the face of the threat of both Russia and China seeking influence in the region.
Anyone who is familiar with Trump knows that he almost certainly doesn’t actually have any intention of using military force in such a manner, but rather he was likely only looking to create a media soundbite claiming that he wants to do that. Remember that Trump is ultimately controlled by the same people who control all Presidents, (link) where such “gaffes” are presumably intentional to make sure that he doesn’t become too popular.
Despite that annoying aspect of Trump, he is much preferable to the Democrats nonetheless. An interesting contrast is the fact that Trump usually “lies” to make himself less popular, whereas Democrats lie to make themselves more popular. The lies of Democrats are much more egregious and harmful as well.
Anastasio Somoza said the following about Marxists in his book “Nicaragua Betrayed,” as is summarized in this chapter summary:
The Communist philosophy is to lie, cheat, steal, or kill as long as it furthers the goal of world domination, which is rapidly being achieved. Marxists have a common ideology, whereas free nations each follow their own course while being mostly oblivious that their common denominator is individual liberty.
Democrat politicians are certainly Marxists, as much of the information in this website explains, including the information at this link.
(Also remember that Republican Neocons and RINOs are hardcore leftists as well, who pretend to be “right wing” in order to get away with it. See this article that explains the true meaning of “left wing” and “right wing.”)
About the issue with Panama
Panama is in fact being exploitative of the United States as Trump is saying, where Jimmy Carter inappropriately singed a treaty in 1978 to hand over control of it in order to empower the Marxist agendas of the global elite.
This article explains that Trump said the following:
“When President Jimmy Carter foolishly gave [the Panama Canal] away, for One Dollar, during his term in Office, it was solely for Panama to manage, not China, or anyone else,” Trump continued. “It was likewise not given for Panama to charge the United States, its Navy, and corporations, doing business within our Country, exorbitant prices and rates of passage. Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama by the U.S. This complete ‘rip-off’ of our Country will immediately stop.”
This article explains the following about the situation:
As things stand, the Panama Canal is legally owned by the government of Panama, but that ownership is not entirely unconditional. The Carter-Torrijos Treaties contain “neutrality” guarantees that, if violated, could present a legal justification for challenging Panamanian ownership.
Otherwise, the government of Panama could voluntarily sell the canal back to the U.S. government. Unlike the complex situation at the turn of the 20th Century, there would be no doubt such a voluntary deal was legitimate and properly respected Panamanian sovereignty — assuming, of course, the Panamanians accepted whatever offer the United States made. It seems unlikely Panama could sell the canal to any other country, given the guarantees made to the U.S. in the Carter-Torrijos Treaties.
It would be great if the U.S. were to buy back the Panama Canal, and Rep. Dusty Johnson of South Dakota has introduced a bill that would authorize Trump to do so, as this article explains. However Trump’s vague threat of military actions to acquire it are concerning, where Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino has “ruled out any possible discussions” with Trump regarding the U.S. taking control of the Panama Canal or about “any reduction in the transit fees imposed to U.S. ships,” as the article also mentions.
This article explains that Mulino has said there is “nothing to talk about” with Trump, where he also claims, “The Canal is not under direct or indirect control, neither by China, nor by the European Community, nor by the United States, nor by any other power. As a Panamanian, I strongly reject any manifestation that distorts this reality.” Additionally he claimed that the rates are not established on a whim, where he said, “They are established publicly and in an open hearing, taking into account market conditions, international competition, operating costs, and the maintenance and modernization needs of the interoceanic route.”
There are reasons to be skeptical of Mulino’s claims that Panama is not under the control of Marxist governments however. Make sure to see this information that details what Anastasio Somoza wrote about the matter in 1980, a few years after Carter singed the treaty to hand over control of the Canal. (Or better yet read the entire summary of that chapter at this link, which includes explaining the interesting “Famous Twelve” episode.)
About the issue with Greenland
Trump is saying that he is interested in the U.S. acquiring Greenland for national defense purposes, for its mineral wealth, and to be used as an additional shipping route.
Greenland’s naturally frigid temperatures can also be used to cool computers in enormous data centers, such as for cryptocurrency mining and for more efficiently cooling supercomputers that require extremely cold temperatures to run. (link and link) See this article which explains that cryptocurrency mining in the neighboring country of Iceland is so widespread for that reason that it uses more energy than the homes in that country.
Of course the idea of “taking Greenland by force” is ridiculous, however acquiring Greenland from Denmark would be very beneficial if it could actually happen. Despite Trump’s hostile statement about the issue, obviously nothing will happen with Greenland unless the people want it to happen, and even then it would be unlikely.
See this article that speculates about the actual value of Greenland.
Denmark had previously said that it is not interested in selling Greenland, (link) a French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot is saying he considers Greenland to be “a territory of the European Union,” (link) and Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte Egede is calling for Greenland to seek independence from the Kingdom of Denmark, also saying, “We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.” (link)
(Also not surprisingly the Establishment media has been deceitfully attempting to reinforce the false claim that “man-caused climate change is real” by claiming that Trump wants Greenland because the supposed “global warming-related retreating sea ice” has opened up a northern shipping route, as this article and this article claim for example. Trump may in fact want Greenland because of a northern sea route, but the sea ice has not been retreating due to climate change as this video and this article explain.)
Part 1 of 2 of the documentary “Praying for Armageddon” which details the Christian Zionism movement in the U.S. See part 2 of 2 at this link.
I generally don’t like the Establishment-run Al Jazeera news outlet, but I thought this two part documentary entitled “Praying for Armageddon” that is critical of the Christian Zionism movement is interesting, where it profiles apparently popular Christian preachers who essentially admit that they want the end of the world to occur, and it also profiles U.S. politicians who espouse the Christian Zionism movement as well.
The documentary explains that many of such Christians are attempting to force the “End Times” to occur by bringing about a world-ending catastrophe by helping to foment a third World War through their support of Zionism.
However the documentary does not get into discussing the fact that the attitudes of such people are covertly being influenced the the global elite; and I noticed in the second part that they attempted to equate the term “Christian Zionist” with “Christian Nationalist,” however those are not the same thing.
While it is not mentioned in the documentary, it is interesting that all of the signs that Christian Zionists say are prophesied to precede the Apocalypse are covertly being engineered by the Illuminati global elite, such as the rise of Islamic extremism. (link and link)
Of course not all Christians (including not all Protestants) have such attitudes. And note that most denominations including Catholicism have also been compromised by the global elite in other ways. (link and link)
Some of the more notorious Christian Zionist politicians are Lindsey Graham who had been advocating for importing Jihadists from Afghanistan into the U.S. (link, link, and link) while at the same time he has been advocating for the use of nuclear weapons on Palestine, (link) which the Republican Congressman and ex-Pastor Tim Walberg also advocates for. (link)
[Note: Trump has a lot of issues such as explained in this documentary, but Harris would have been much worse because the Democrats would ultimately have been just as much of Zionist war hawks, but with them also implementing their intentionally harmful anti-American agendas. (link, link, and link)
Another reason why Harris would have been much worse is because it is very acceptable in the mainstream media to criticize Trump, while criticizing Harris would not have been considered acceptable because she is a Democrat and a black woman. Even the monster Joe Biden was never criticized in the media simply because he is a Democrat! Could you imagine the sort of kid gloves that Harris would have been treated with? Don’t ever vote for a Democrat.
I think it is disappointing that polls say 79 percent of Jewish people in the U.S. voted for Harris. (link) According to the linked article many Jews are saying that they didn’t want to vote for Trump because of his extreme pro-Zionist stances.
Unfortunately however it is reasonable to only assume that most of the Jewish voters for Harris want open borders in the West (but not in Israel), (link) where many of them may also be planning to eventually move to Israel.
(Incidentally I don’t understand why any Christian would even want the Rapture to occur, because every Christian goes to Heaven after they die anyway, but if the Rapture happens it would effectively “damn every non-Christian at that point in time to Hell” and presumably “damn everyone born after that point in time to Hell” as well, at least as I understand the Biblical writings about the matter. Additionally chaos would supposedly happen on Earth at the moment that happens, for example presumably cars and planes that are being driven by Christians would crash and harm people. I think if that is the case then if anything people including Christians should instead be doing whatever they can to make sure that the Rapture doesn’t happen.)]
___
Also listen to this interview of James Perloff where he explains much evidence showing that the Christian Zionism movement has been engineered behind the scenes by the global elite, such as through the “Scofield Reference Bible” being created with the covert influence of the political Establishment. [Note the discussion gets in-depth and occasionally they speak about issues that some claim are antisemitic. For example they briefly discuss an issue about a few passages in Jewish Talmudic scripture that are hostile towards non-Jews. I prefer not to focus on such issues because I see it as being unfair to modern Jews who mostly don’t take that seriously. I do think it is acceptable for such information to at least be mentioned however.]
This documentary “Israelism: How Young American Jews’ Views of Israel Are Shifting” explains how many American Jews who have traditionally been pro-Israel are becoming disillusioned due to the conflict in Palestine, where many are now gravitating to leftist activist groups that are opposed to the conflict.
[Note: Since this documentary is from the pro-Establishment Vice media outlet I had rather low expectations about it which turned out to be correct.
I wouldn’t trust the activist groups that are profiled in the documentary to actually be very effective, where for example they most likely don’t allow communicating about the most significant truths of the matter such as Hamas being operated by the global elite (link) and the October 7th attacks being an inside job. (link)
Also the documentary does not address the issues of widespread extremist attitudes of Palestinians and many other Muslims, (link and link) and it attempts to create an impression that “white supremacy” is the most significant threat to both Jews and Palestinians!
The Vice media outlet also created this documentary that deceptively attempts to advocate for the spread of Islam in Latin America.]
This is part one of a three part documentary “The Secret History of Al Qaeda” which explains how the terrorist organization Al Qaeda was covertly associated with the Western political Establishment. The video also contains a Q&A section with its creators.
Among other issues, this episode explains the British agenda of covertly controlling the Middle East since the 1800’s, but note that it doesn’t acknowledge the fact that the Iranian Revolution that happened in 1979 was the work of covert British and U.S. activity, which the book “Hostage to Khomeini” explains in detail.
See the other two parts of this documentary at this link.
Also see this article which is a summary of 9/11 related issues.
The law has since been put on hold due to a lawsuit that is calling the law “unconstitutional on its face” and “not neutral toward religion.” (link)
National Republicans including President Trump have supported the law, where Trump wrote on social media that “[Posting the Ten Commandments] in public schools, private schools and many other places [could be the] first major step in the revival of religion, which is desperately needed, in our country.” Other states such as Texas are attempting to do the same as Louisiana is doing.
I think mandating that the Ten Commandments are displayed in public school classrooms should definitely be thought of as being inappropriate due to it being the government forcing religion upon students.
How would people who support that law think about other religions or sects of Christianity that they don’t belong to being imposed upon their kids in a similar manner?
Supporters of allowing religion in public schools point out that the First Amendment of the Constitution does not “prohibit” religion, but rather it does not “impede” it. (link) The Constitution was written to guarantee people their God-given rights, (link) and it was also written based on Christian values even though Christianity was not specifically mentioned.
Recent Supreme Court rulings that have nullified the previous policy of the separation of church and state are also having consequences that many Christians have not anticipated, such as enabling the establishment of Islamic prayer rooms in schools, (link and link) as well as enabling “after-school Satan clubs” in schools. (link)
While I’m all in favor of the propagation of Christian values, I think the separation of church and state is an essential tenant of a free society. If people want their religion to be a part of their school they should go to a private school that caters to it.
Is it reasonable to think that the Louisiana politicians really even have “good intentions” with their legislation? I don’t think so. I think if they actually meant well they would have mandated that the the Bill of Rights be displayed instead.
Lexis Roberts, Krystal Tobias, and Laura Hobbs— all of whose killers had their death sentences commuted by Joe Biden.
An Information Liberation article explains that Joe Biden commuted the death sentences of 37 of 40 people on federal death row two days before Christmas, where their punishments had been downgraded to life imprisonment.
Biden said of his decision, “… guided by my conscience and my experience as a public defender, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Vice President, and now President, I am more convinced than ever that we must stop the use of the death penalty at the federal level. In good conscience, I cannot stand back and let a new administration resume executions that I halted.”
Biden didn’t commute the sentences for three of the inmates however, supposedly because he thought their crimes were particularly severe. However his doing that sends a ridiculous message that he thought the 37 others didn’t “deserve” the punishment of death simply because their crimes weren’t egregious enough to warrant it, instead of actually being due to any supposed ideological opposition that he has to capital punishment!
Following are the circumstances of some of the people whose sentences Biden commuted:
— Thomas Sanders kidnapped, shot, and cut the throat of a 12-year-old girl Lexis Roberts in Louisiana in 2010, which was days after she watched him murder her mother on a road trip near the Grand Canyon.
— Anthony Battle murdered an Atlanta prison guard with a hammer while serving a life sentence for murdering his wife in 1987 at Camp Lejeune, NC.
— Jorge Avila-Torrez sexually assaulted and stabbed to death two girls Laura Hobbs, 8, and Krystal Tobias, 9— who had been riding their bicycles in their neighborhood in a suburb north of Chicago in 2005. Then four years later he strangled a naval officer Amanda Snell, 20, inside her barrack in Arlington, Va.
— Louri Mikhel murdered five Russian and Georgian immigrants after kidnapping them for ransom, which in some cases was paid before he killed them anyway.
— Kaboni Savage ordered the deaths of 12 people including four children while he was a Philadelphia drug dealer.
— James Roane, Jr. participated in the murder of 11 people while he was a drug dealer in Richmond, Va.
Biden also issued a blanket pardon for his son Hunter in early December, erasing his June conviction of three federal gun felonies, and erasing his guilty plea in September for $1.4 million in tax fraud due to his foreign business dealings that also involved Joe Biden. (link)
It is interesting that the three people whose sentences he didn’t commute were involved in mass casualty events. For example he didn’t commute the death sentence of the supposed “Boston Marathon Bomber” Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
The Boston Marathon bombing was a phony staged false flag attack, (link) as was the Sandy Hook school shooting, (link) and the Buffalo, New York grocery store shooting. (link)
Obviously the political Establishment has been planning to stage a phony execution of Tsarnaev in order to place him into some sort of a witness relocation-type program with a new identity, therefore Biden didn’t commute his death sentence as a favor to him.
I don’t know if the other two people that he didn’t commute were also involved in staged operations, but the fact that those sentences weren’t commuted should be cause for speculation.
[Note also that many people are aware that Alex Jones was sued by the Sandy Hook families for his saying the attack was staged, but it was a sham trial where I think Jones could have fought the lawsuit more effectively if he wanted to. I hope he won’t actually have to pay anything.
Jones is an essential source of information, but he generally does not address issues of staged false flag attacks that are phony, and as far as I know he didn’t even really say much about the Sandy Hook attack being phony other than perhaps briefly mentioning it.
I believe that Jones thinks it is much preferable that such attacks are phony rather than real, where he may be concerned that if he exposes the attacks as being phony it would lead to the political Establishment having no choice but to engage in real ones instead.
However a problem with that is that it makes people who expose the truth about such phony attacks be discredited in the eyes of the public, and it also likely causes people to be afraid of associating with people who talk about such incidents out of fear of being sued for doing so.
Personally I believe the Sandy Hook families actually somehow “wanted” to force Jones to expose the deception that occurred on that day by bringing their lawsuit against him, but for whatever reason he didn’t seem to want to do that.
Watch an informative talk by Jim Fetzer on the homepage of the website allthingsreconstered.tv, where he details the situation of both the lawsuits that were brought by the Sandy Hook families who were trying to separately sue him and Alex Jones. (I recommend starting watching at about 21 minutes into the video.) He also mentions this article which explains the situation.
Also see Fetzer’s semi-daily broadcasts at his show on Bitchute]
Jimmy Carter has died at age 100, and the media is lionizing him as being a particularly “moral” and “righteous” president as this article does, however the reality is very different.
Carter was one the most harmful of presidents, where the global elite exploited his seemingly “friendly and innocent nature” by using him as a puppet to cause damage across the world by betraying allies of the United States, such as by covertly overthrowing Nicaragua with Communism, and covertly overthrowing Iran to install the brutal Ayatollah Khomeini.
Also in 1980 Jimmy Carter along with Joe Biden spearheaded a program that continues to this day secretively importing Islam into the United States, where millions of Muslims have been brought into the country. (link)
James Perloff summarized Carter’s administration well in his book “The Shadows of Power”:
The other recent Democrat presidents Bill Clinton (also see this video), Barack Obama, and Joe Biden were deceptively harmful as well.
Republicans are usually bad also, but at least they aren’t portrayed in the media as being “the compassionate good guys,” thus resulting in people being more critical of them. Also Republicans tend to advocate more “not to change things,” therefore they can’t get away with implementing as many new harmful and little understood agendas.
The article page contains the following main sections:
— A summary of Chapter 10 from the book “The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline” speaking about issues with Jimmy Carter’s administration.
— Text from pages 1-2 of the book “Hostage to Khomeini” which explains how Iran was covertly overrun by the political Establishment in order to install the brutal Ayatollah Khomeini.
— Chapter 20 of Anastasia Somoza’s Book “Nicaragua Betrayed” summarizing key points of how the Jimmy Carter Administration delivered Nicaragua to a Marxist government which is closely associated with Fidel Castro’s Cuba.
Thousands of leftists throughout the U.S. and the rest of the world have been publicly fawning over Luigi Mangione, who allegedly shot and killed the CEO of a health insurance company on the street in New York City in early December, where he is now widely being treated as a “folk hero” for the murder including on mainstream television shows.
However, the behavior of his supporters is so irrational and ridiculous that it brings into question the legitimacy of their actions, where they seem to be engaging in a form of artificially coordinated gaslighting.
It is also shown that Mangione’s family is associated with Nancy Pelosi, and he seems to be a part of the CIA’s MK-Ultra mind control program, as is explained in an Alex Jones video in this article.
Following are excerpts from the Wikipedia page about the killing of Brian Thompson:
Brian Thompson, the CEO of the American health insurance company UnitedHealthcare, was shot and killed in Midtown Manhattan, New York City, on December 4, 2024. The shooting occurred early in the morning outside an entrance to the New York Hilton Midtown. Thompson was in the city to attend an annual investors’ meeting for UnitedHealth Group, the parent company of UnitedHealthcare. Prior to his death, he faced criticism for the company's rejection of insurance claims, and his family reported that he had received death threats in the past. … The suspect, initially described as a white man wearing a mask, fled the scene. On December 9, 2024, authorities arrested 26-year-old Luigi Mangione in Altoona, Pennsylvania, and charged him with Thompson's killing in a Manhattan court.
Authorities said Mangione was carrying a 3D-printed pistol and a 3D-printed suppressor consistent with those used in the attack, as well as a short handwritten letter styled as a manifesto criticizing the American healthcare system, an American passport, and multiple fraudulent IDs, including one with the same name used to check into a hostel on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. Authorities also said his fingerprints matched those that investigators found near the New York shooting scene. Police believe that he was inspired by Ted Kaczynski's essay Industrial Society and Its Future (1995), and motivated by his personal views on health insurance. They say an injury he suffered may have played a part. Mangione was arraigned in Altoona on December 9, 2024. After waiving extradition in Pennsylvania, he appeared in a federal court in New York City on December 19. On December 23, he was arraigned in the New York Supreme Court and pled not guilty to New York state charges Mangione has been indicted on eleven state charges and faces four federal charges; the charges include first-degree murder,[a] murder in furtherance of terrorism, criminal possession of a weapon, and stalking. He is eligible for the death penalty.
…
The shooter has been called a folk hero and celebrated as a vigilante by some of the general public. He has been compared to Robin Hood and the Dillinger Gang. Internet users nicknamed the perpetrator “the Adjuster”, “the Claims Adjuster”, and “Robin Hoodie”. Mangione has also been noted for his perceived physical attractiveness. The McDonald’s where Mangione was arrested was review bombed as a result of a tip from a customer who alerted an employee after recognizing the suspect. “Wanted posters” of CEOs appeared in Manhattan. Street art, graffiti, and signs in support of Mangione appeared on buildings, streets, highways, and other places. A billboard with the words “Free Luigi” was seen in Riverside County, California.
This Alex Jones video explains that Luigi Mangione’s family is associated with Nancy Pelosi, and he seems to be a part of the CIA MK-Ultra mind control program.
___
I wouldn’t put anything past many leftists, but nonetheless I don’t believe that such a sizable movement of people would actually idolize Mangione, where rather it seems to be a form a gaslighting that is being coordinated by the political Establishment.
The leftists are ridiculously fawning over someone who allegedly ambushed and murdered someone on the street that was simply the CEO of a health insurance company! The person he killed wasn’t even a “criminal” or a “far-right politician” or a “Nazi” or whatever, etc..
I think perhaps a tiny amount of Antifa-type leftists would genuinely idolize the guy (mostly on the West Coast of the U.S.), but certainly many thousands of people would not think that way. I believe the people who are acting that way are Freemasons who are doing what the Masonic Lodge is telling them to do, apparently in order to increase divisiveness in the U.S., and perhaps even to help stoke additional support for Trump for example.
See the following articles explaining how thousands of leftists are supposedly revering Mangione as a “folk hero:”
December 11, 2024 Breitbart article: “Left-Wing Sunrise Movement Appears to Justify UnitedHealthcare Exec’s Slaying: ‘CEOs Commit Mass Murder’” (link) — “The murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson amid systemic failures, corporate greed, and injustices, is ‘what we get,’ according to the left-wing climate justice group The Sunrise Movement, which insisted the supportive reaction to the killing ‘isn’t shocking,’ while arguing that young people have ‘grown up watching CEOs commit mass murder.’”
December 11, 2024 Breitbart article: “WATCH: Jon Stewart’s ‘Daily Show’ Audience Boos UnitedHealthcare Shooting Suspect’s Capture” (link) — “Jon Stewart’s ‘Daily Show’ audience erupted into boos on Tuesday night when the suspect UnitedHealthcare shooter’s capture was mentioned during the host’s monologue.”
December 12, 2024 Breitbart article: “Report: UPenn Professor Describes UnitedHealthcare CEO Murder Suspect as ‘Icon We All Need’” (link) — “A professor at the University of Pennsylvania reportedly described UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson’s alleged killer as an ‘icon,’ per the New York Post.”
December 21, 2024 Breitbart article: “Report: ‘Groupies’ Send Love Letters to Accused UnitedHealthcare CEO Killer Luigi Mangione in Jail” (link) — “During his time at Huntingdon State Correctional Institute in Pennsylvania, 26-year-old Luigi Mangione apparently got over 140 messages from people that included his so-called “groupies,” the New York Post reported on Saturday.”
December 22, 2024 Breitbart article: “Watch: ‘Saturday Night Live’ Audience Shockingly Cheers for Luigi Mangione” (link) — “During Saturday Night Live’s ‘Weekend Update’ comedy news bit segment, anchor Colin Jost was shocked when his audience cheered when he mention Luigi Mangione, the man accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.”
December 25, 2024 Breitbart article: “No Assassin Merch Under the Christmas Tree: Copyright Claims Target Items Celebrating Accused CEO Killer Luigi Mangione” (link) — “The accused CEO killer, a darling of the left, can be found on tee shirts and every other imaginable piece of merchandise, but copyright claims are taking them down at a rapid pace.”
December 25, 2024 Independent article: “Luigi Mangione’s sweater sells out at Nordstrom one day after court appearance” (link) — “Luigi Mangione, the man suspected of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, became an unlikely fashion influencer after his appearance in a Manhattan courtroom.”
Image from BigStockPhoto.
Both the UK and Australia will soon be requiring biometric ago verification for users of many social media platforms by utilizing systems such as AI facial recognition, purportedly in order to ensure that younger users do not have access to those platforms.
Such concepts of limiting access to information is often accepted by well-meaning people who don’t realize the ramifications of what it will mean, where the global elite are intending to eventually use it as an excuse to implement a system that will track everyone’s online activity and limit viewing important information that the political Establishment doesn’t want to be seen.
In a manner that is typical of how leftists often think, parents who are particularly supportive of the agenda want “Big Brother” to police what their children do online rather than taking responsibility and doing what is the most effective by teaching their kids proper discernment in the first place. Most kids would figure out how to circumvent such systems if they want to do so anyway, while the rest of the citizens will be stuck with needing to live under the repressive limitations of the new system.
This issue is another example of how a supposed “conservative revival” is being implemented only in cases of when the elite can deceptively exploit it for their own purposes— such as how some U.S. states have rolled back regulations to allow the open carrying of guns in public rather than only allowing the more appropriate concealed carry regulations, (link) and how the Supreme Court’s recent ruling to start allowing religion in public schools has enabled the implementation of Islamic prayer rooms and after-school Satan clubs in schools.
This is also another example of how the British Commonwealth countries have a significant additional layer of tyranny that the U.S. does not have. The biometric ID agenda will also likely be implemented in the EU soon as well. (See this documentary that explains the repressive anti-freedom configuration of the EU.)
(Remember also that Australian politicians were recently attempting to sue Elon Musk to globally remove content from Twitter because they did not want it to be seen.)
I feel sympathy for the people living in countries that are subjected to such tyranny. The U.S. has problems also but it is more free than any other country. See this documentary that explains why that is the case. (Note also that the political Establishment does not want Europeans and Australians to be aware of the information in that documentary, where it does whatever it can to create confusion about the matter. See this article about that issue.)
About Australia’s “Online Safety Amendment Bill 2024” which bans the availability of many social media platforms for children under the age of 16
Note that most of this information is from this Life Site News article, found via Infowars.
Australia has passed a social media ban for children under the age of 16, which may initially sound like a good idea, however serious issues exist with doing so due to the bill being a step toward creating an online surveillance system for all Australians, similar to the situation in Communist China.
On November 28 the Australian Senate passed the “Online Safety Amendment Bill 2024” with a 34-19 vote, making it the world’s first social media ban for children.
The bill threatens social media companies with fines up to 50 million AUD (32 million USD) if they fail to comply with verifying the age of their users. The bill does not give details about how the age verification will work, and it will not start to be enforced until the end of 2025.
Technically the bill was approved under the condition that social media platforms must not force their users to give them their personal data, including information from government-issued IDs, which seems to rule out the possibility of the use of Digital IDs for now. However those are apparently false assurances that are intended to placate the public in the meantime, according to other information being put out by the government.
Supporters of the bill have said that the system will use biometric methods such as facial scans to verify the age of its users, (link) which would mean that social media companies would collect the biometric data of all their users in Australia.
Also an explanatory memorandum put out by the Australian government (link) attempts to create an impression that the system would not be invasive due to supposed “robust” privacy protections, while at the same time it explains that “compliance with the minimum age obligation” will likely require platforms “to implement systems and procedures to monitor and respond to age-restricted users circumventing age assurance.” This means that social media companies will likely need to continually monitor a user while they are using the platform, such as by repeatedly doing face scans to ensure that the user is still the same and at least 16 years old.
The bill does not mention which companies will be affected by the age restriction, but the Communications Minister Michelle Rowland said that TikTok, Instagram, X, Reddit, Facebook, and Snapchat will likely be included, while YouTube will be excluded due to its “educational purposes.” (link)
About Australia’s draconian recent “Misinformation and Disinformation Bill” and other recent attempts at censorship
Australia was also recently attempting to pass a ridiculous bill that would have forced social media companies to remove information that the government deems as being “reasonably verifiable as false” or “misinformation and disinformation” whenever government officials wish to do so. (link and link) And Australian politicians were recently attempting to sue Elon Musk to remove content from Twitter at a global level because they did not want it to be seen. (link)
The UK’s “Online Safety Act” will soon require online platforms to perform biometric age verification of their users, where companies who don’t comply will be required to pay massive fines and their executives could even be imprisoned
Following is a summary of this article on the website ReclaimTheNet.org, which has been found on Infowars.com.
The UK’s communications regulator Ofcom is preparing to announce in January requirements that online platforms will have to meet to enforce age verification, which will apparently involve some sort of facial recognition judging by statements made by Ofcom’s Online Safety Policy Director Jon Higham.
The agenda is a result of the country’s online censorship law called the Online Safety Act.
Higham said in an interview that companies behind the platforms will be required to implement technology that is highly accurate and effective, where he mentioned facial age estimation for guessing if a user is a child or an adult. He didn’t go into details, but he is likely referring to existing systems that have users take “selfies” where AI is used to analyze the person’s face to assess their age, which is touted as being a less privacy-invasive way of determining a user’s age than having to submit a government-issued ID to websites.
Tech companies who are found to be in violation of the Online Safety act’s rules will be required to pay massive fines of up to 10 percent of their global sales revenue, and if the infractions continue their executives could spend up to two years in prison.
The information in this graphic is from Wikipedia. Note that its statistics are from 2010— fifteen years ago, before the massive amounts of immigration that has been happening since then!
The number of babies born in the EU has dropped to a record low last year, which has been a decline of 5.5% since the previous year. The number of births last year was the lowest in the EU countries since such data was first collected in 1961.
Most Europeans are not adequately informed about the issue of declining birth rates, due to the political Establishment intending for such a decline to happen in order for native Europeans to be replaced by incoming populations— especially to be replaced by Muslims. See this article for details about that matter.
Also see these articles about the issue:
December 3, 2024 RT article: “EU reports dramatic fall in birth rate” (link) — “The number of babies born in the EU states fell to a record low last year, according to the latest data from the bloc’s statistical office (Eurostat). Despite this, the total population has been on the rise due to mass immigration.”
December 12, 2024 Raymond Ibrahim article: “Baby Muhammad Takes Over Much of Europe” (link) — “‘Muhammad’ is now the most popular name for newborn baby boys in England and Wales, according to a report released on December 5 by the United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics. … This is to say nothing of other Arabic/Muslim names, which are also topping the charts for newborn babies. … In Germany, about 20% of the population is set to be Muslim by 2050; Austria too.”
June 8, 2024 Raymond Ibrahim article: “Vienna: A Case Study of the ‘Great Replacement’” (link) — “Whoever doubts the merits of the ‘great replacement theory’ — which holds that global ‘elites’ are replacing white, Christian populations with nonwhite, non-Christian (especially Muslim) populations — should take a good look at Austria.”
VIDEO: The Welsh government in the UK has been trying to attract migrants by making welcome videos featuring young teenage girls (link) — [This is rather old news that I posted on a Various News article earlier this year, but it is so outrageous that I think I should mention it again here.]
Native Europeans need to become more aware that they should be having larger families
This issue with the declining birth rates could be improved if more native Europeans would become aware of the problem, leading to them consciously deciding to have larger families.
For example, people who are already having families who know that they will do a good job of it should choose to have twice as many kids or more, where if they were initially planning on only having two kids they could have four instead.
Also such women could make it a point to become pregnant again soon after giving birth, so the labor-intensive aspects of raising infants wouldn’t be as drawn out. For example if they didn’t take a year off between having children the diapers phases would be over in half the number of years.
I think many Europeans are choosing not to have more than only one or two children due to being exposed to a lifetime of propaganda telling them that “white people are bad,” and some are perhaps concerned that people would think they are somehow “racist” for having additional children.
Europeans are also often very naive about believing climate change propaganda, (link) where they have been told that having too many children will cause the ice caps to melt, for example.
School children in Europe should also be given three month vacations from school each year as kids receive in the U.S., instead of only a few weeks! Europeans are robbed of their childhoods with their intensive schooling, leading to many deciding to have their “childhood” later in life and not have kids.
Canadians would gain many freedoms if their country would become states of the U.S.
(Also note the Great Lakes would become a distinctive feature of the country on maps. Perhaps the areas along its shorelines would become more populated as a result. Image from Wikipedia.)
It is interesting to see the Hollywood celebrities who “threaten to move to Canada” for whatever reason, yet they never do.
Canada, like all British Commonwealth countries, is not nearly as free of a country as the United States is, where technically it is a “Constitutional Monarchy” while the United States is a “Constitutional Republic.”
The difference between the two types of governments becomes very pronounced when it matters the most— such as during the Covid lockdown and with Canada’s recent gun confiscation agendas for example.
The U.S. has a lot of problems too, but its system of government was designed to prevent tyrannical rule, where it had to fight a war to free itself from many of the problems that the British Commonwealth countries and also the European Union countries currently have.
It can be argued that the problems in the U.S. are due to the laziness of its citizens who haven’t been bothering to become better informed and improve their situations, whereas in other countries it is exponentially more difficult for their citizens to make changes due to the roadblocks that exist in the configurations of their governments.
Donald Trump has recently been in the media due to making a joke about making Canada a part of the U.S., and Establishment communicators such as late night talk show hosts have been ridiculing him for the comments, attempting to create an impression that Trump’s hubris was outrageous since Canada is “a place of enlightenment” as opposed to “the ignorant and backward U.S.,” etc..
Trump also strangely “played along” with the Establishment’s narrative in some sort of weird gaslighting where he posted a Tweet of himself with a Canadian flag looking out over the Matterhorn mountain, which is actually located in Switzerland:
Thats the Matterhorn.
— Roshan Rinaldi (@Roshan_Rinaldi) December 4, 2024
It's in Switzerland, Einstein. pic.twitter.com/SKNq2Y8iR9
Despite the political Establishment constantly attempting to make the rest of the world think that the U.S. is “backward,” Canadians would find that they would benefit very much from becoming states of the U.S., and there would be benefits for the U.S. as well. Such an acquisition could also be done in a way where conservative and liberal parts of the country could be made their own states in order to maintain a balance between the two.
The article page contains the following main sections:
— Canada becoming U.S. states would be beneficial for everyone, but North America degrading more into the totalitarian NAU would be a terrible situation.
— Canada and the other British Commonwealth countries have tyrannical governments.
— The European Union countries have many of the same problems as the British Commonwealth countries.
— The United States is the only truly free country.
Justin Trudeau and Fidel Castro
In a story that is perhaps as strange as Michelle Obama being a man, much evidence shows that Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is actually the son of Cuba’s Communist dictator Fidel Castro.
Justin Trudeau’s father Pierre Trudeau was the Prime Minister of Canada during the 1970’s and 1980’s, and he was a known Marxist Communist who along with his wife Margaret Trudeau were close friends with Fidel Castro.
[Note: I had been intending to make a Trudeau / Castro article for some time now, however I wasn’t expecting to get so thorough and detailed with the issue. I can’t help but feel bad for Trudeau though since he didn’t have any choice about who his father is (in both the cases of Fidel and Pierre.)
The situation of Justin Trudeau is a good one to highlight because it illustrates how there is ultimately only one group of people who run the world.
Of course I don’t think Justin is as bad as Fidel, but I do think his forced vaccinations, gun confiscations, and importing Islamism are very concerning for example. Just like all world leaders, I’m sure the global elite don’t really give him much of a choice about what he is told to do.
I think most of such world leaders are usually miserable. Perhaps he secretly or subconsciously wanted to shed light on his situation with his strange eulogy of Castro (mentioned later in this article.)]
View the entire article >>
The following images are from an article on Medium.com.
This article summarizes a book that explains how the previous Prime Minister of Canada Pierre Trudeau (the father of the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau) was an extreme Marxist Communist, how he had appointed many extreme Communists to his administration, and how he had secretively been advancing many extreme Communist groups and agendas during his administration.
[Note: This article is based on the information in this article entitled “Pierre Trudeau was a Communist,” however I don’t know what its original source is or who wrote it. Apparently is it from a book that was written in 1970 when Pierre Trudeau was the Prime Minister of Canada.]
However many issues exist with the project, where respected experts about AI are calling the agenda dangerous, and it is affiliated with people such as Larry Ellison and Bill Gates who have both made disturbing statements in the past about their intentions for the use of AI.
Carter was one the most harmful of presidents, where the global elite exploited his seemingly “friendly and innocent nature” by using him as a puppet to cause damage across the world by betraying allies of the United States.
However, the behavior of his supporters is so irrational and ridiculous that it brings into question the legitimacy of their actions, where they seem to be engaging in a form of artificially coordinated gaslighting.
Justin Trudeau’s father Pierre Trudeau was the Prime Minister of Canada during the 1970’s and 1980’s, and he was a known Marxist Communist who along with his wife Margaret Trudeau were close friends with Fidel Castro.
This article summarizes every time either Cuba or Fidel Castro were mentioned in the book.
The findings may surprise you, as most commonly assumed effects of global warming are shown to usually be extremely exaggerated and in many cases completely false.
The documentary examines the science and motives behind claims of the effects of global warming being extreme and created mostly by man’s activities, and it shows how such claims are frequently exaggerated for deceptive and dangerous globalist agendas.
Communication style can be “communicative” to win the support of those being communicated with, or “solidifying” which entrenches people’s opinions on both sides of an issue. This article describes aspects of the two styles and conducts a theoretical study of the practical voting results of the styles being used against each other. It is shown by graphing theoretical voting results that effective “communicative” style will always trump the effects of “solidifying” style.
Video of the violence perpetrated by the group of over 30 government sponsored provocateurs is shown, followed by evidence including local news reports that shows how the group was housed and protected by law enforcement officials during the week of the demonstrations.
This article explains many benefits of the cultivation and use of the hemp plant.