by Edward Ulrich, updated September 15, 2024

This video talks about an issue of armed migrant gangs becoming empowered in Colorado and elsewhere in the U.S.

Also see this article explaining that Colorado’s governor Jared Polis (who is a homosexual that has a husband, where he was somehow elected despite many areas of that state being conservative) is telling citizens to ignore the issue of the armed Venezuelans.

While all of this has been happening, Establishment media pundits such as John Oliver have been falsely claiming “there is no migrant crime wave,” as this article explains.



Issues with Donald Trump and Immigration in the U.S.


I saw this article from a local newspaper in State College, PA which is attempting to create fear about an extreme “Agenda 2025” which is apparently some sort of an Establishment disinformation campaign that the media and politicians have been attempting to associate with Trump, despite his constantly publicly disavowing it.

I graduated from Penn State University in the 1990’s.  The school didn’t have any discernible bias while I was attending it, but according to news reports that I’ve been seeing over the years it has apparently become a leftist extremists institution just like most of the rest of universities have in the U.S.

In any event, the “enlightened” leftists at such Universities don’t need to fret about Trump.  For example he actually isn’t going to do much to fix the immigration problems despite his spoken rhetoric about it.

During his first term, Trump mostly only focused on proclaiming that “he was going to build a border wall” while almost never mentioning the most significant immigration problems such as them being released into the U.S. to wait for their hearings that are scheduled years in the future. (link)  When he was questioned about such issues he would often make excuses such as saying that “an Obama appointed judge in California told him that he couldn’t do anything about that, etc..,” (link) rather than simply going ahead with the appropriate actions anyway since such judges were attempting to enforce illegal policies.

Even Trump’s “border wall” was a farce, and strangely he even attempted to claim at the end of his term that he “finished the wall.” (link)

Trump eventually did implement at least some useful agendas however, such as the “Remain in Mexico policy,” however the effectiveness of that and other policies were immediately negated once he threw the election to Biden at the end of his term by not effectively challenging the fraud that occurred in the election. (link)

Nonetheless Trump is much preferable to the Democrats since he usually at least appropriately advocates for what needs to be done.  He would be much more effective if he was called out more often by his supporters whenever he strays, which they rarely do unfortunately.  Many of his high profile supporters are Freemasons who are doing what they are told to do.

Based on what he did in his past administration, the most that Trump will likely be willing to do is to reduce the flow of migrants that are coming in while he is in office, and he will likely not be allowed to permanently dismantle the corrupt system that has been allowing them in despite it theoretically being possible for him to do so.

[Note: September 15, 2024— I improved the wording of the preceding two paragraphs.  I think Trump wants to do what is right but all Presidents are ultimately required to do as they are instructed by the political Establishment.

If anyone is wondering about the potential of Trump actually deporting people as he has sometimes been talking about, they should realize that most Americans are too squeamish to even agree to stop the flow of illegal migrants coming into the country in the first place!  A few people are saying that they are in favor of large scale deportations, but that will never happen except perhaps for migrants who commit crimes.

It is most important to stop the influx of illegal migrants coming in the first place, which is by far the easiest and most effective approach.  I think deportations can work in some cases such as if they commit crimes, but a policy of mass deportations would not work and it would never be agreed to happen by enough people, and if Trump makes it too much of a platform it could cause him to lose the election (and it would give the political Establishment a way to make stealing the election from him appear as if it legitimately happened.)]

(I support much of what Trump at least says he will do, however I don’t support his extreme non-critical pro-Israel stances that most other Republicans and Democrats also share.  I usually like Israeli people but the Israeli government is very corrupt and harmful.)



Lack of public knowledge about the immigration situation in the U.S. is a significant cause of the problems


One of the biggest hindrances to anything being done about the immigration problem is most people’s lack of knowledge about the nature and extent off the issue due to a media blackout about the topic, including even in much of the conservative media.

For example most people are unaware that the Biden administration has been flying migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela and Nicaragua into Florida, Texas, and other states since January, where almost 350,000 have been brought in so far, in addition to the whatever migrants that have been crossing the border during that time.

In addition to the U.S. doing that, Nicaragua has been intentionally weaponizing illegal immigration into the U.S. through facilitating the passage of Latin Americans, Africans, Middle Easterners, and Asians as “blackmail” to force U.S. sanctions relief, as this article explains.  (And note that the totalitarian regime of Nicaragua is covertly controlled by the global elite.)

Additionally, the media constantly lies about the number of illegal migrants that are in the U.S., where the most reliable estimates show that at least 30 million were already in the U.S. even before Joe Biden’s open borders which have allowed tens of millions more to come in. (link)



Issues with Kamala Harris and Immigration in the U.S.


Kamala Harris and the Democrats have been trying to “blame Trump and the Republicans” for the immigration problems by claiming that the Republicans “voted against the Democrat’s ‘border bill’ for corrupt and selfish reasons.” (link) However the bill actually would not have done anything significant to stop the immigration, as this article explains in detail.

Harris has been claiming that she wants to “hire more border guards,” but the actual job of the “guards” would only be to facilitate even more illegal immigration happening, as this article explains.

When Harris claims that she wants to “‘fix’ the border issue,” what she means is that she wants to make what is currently “illegal” be “legal.”  For example during campaigning in 2020, Harris along with most of the rest of the Democrat candidates openly advocated for removing criminal penalties for crossing the border illegally, as the videos at this link explain, among other issues.

It is no exaggeration to say that if Harris wins, it will mean the end of the United States. (link)

 by Edward Ulrich, September 1, 2024 St. Anne’s Church, Buffalo, NY


This article by Raymond Ibrahim explains that the historic St. Anne’s Church in Buffalo, NY was sold to a Muslim organization for only $250,000 to be turned into an Islamic “victory mosque.”

The Catholic Church has a long history of engaging in a sacrilegious practice of giving churches away to be converted into nightclubs or mosques or private residences rather than tearing them down.  It is only a matter of time before this church will be loudly broadcasting the Islamic Call to Prayer throughout the town on a daily basis, as these mosques do in the U.S.  Can you imagine the plight of the Christian people who grew up in that neighborhood who now have such a towering desecration being forced upon them?

Other parts of the country have had success in organizing to push back against the Establishment’s agenda of Islamizing the U.S. (link) and Islamizing the West in general. (link and link)  However no such pushback will happen in liberal areas, where many are imploding into tyrannical hellholes where illegal aliens, Muslims, and all other sorts of leftist types (link) are increasingly being put into positions of authority where they are replacing local police forces though Marxist “community policing” agendas. (link)

(For a good example of problems with “community patrols” be sure to read this article that explains specific past abuses by Muslim Community Patrols in New York City.)

 by Edward Ulrich, updated July 31, 2024 [Note: July 31, 2024: Additional links have been added to this article.]





This campaign video for Kamala Harris is communicated in a manner that has been calculated to be agreeable to many people.  Trump on the other hand usually communicates in a divisive and even ridiculous manner.

It is important to realize that the style of communication of a candidate is really the only thing that most voters know or care about.  The surface is an important part of the whole, so it should not be considered to be superficial for a candidate to also be concerned about their outward appearances.

Harris had been rated as the most liberal of all U.S. Senators (link), which is really saying something.  See the previous NOITV article about issues with Joe Biden, and realize that Harris’ stances are even worse.

In any event, despite what many in the conservative media are claiming, Trump is as much a part of the political Establishment as the rest of the politicians are.

Trump has recently been getting very sketchy with his “assassination attempt” and the ridiculous divisive things he has been saying since that occurred, such as saying that “people won’t ever have to vote ever again” after he wins, and saying that people should be put in jail for a year if they desecrate the U.S. flag for example.

Trump has always been disingenuous, however.  Remember that in his previous term he brought the COVID lockdown and the vaccines (link), he didn’t actually do anything significant about fixing the immigration problem when in fact he could have (link), and then he threw the election to Biden while playing along with supposedly being persecuted (link).  Also Trump’s rallies are usually full of Freemasons (link and link) who are knowingly going along with his antics.

As bad as Trump is, I do think he is preferable though.  But conservatives need to realize that he is not “their friend” and he needs to be called out whenever he strays, which is all the time.  The concept of being an activist is totally foreign to most conservatives, who usually assume that all they need to do is “vote for a Republican” and it will fix everything.

I don’t know why Alex Jones has been so uncritical of Trump, he shouldn’t be.

Jones has put out a lot of good information in the past, however.  For example the following three clips from Alex Jones’ documentary “Endgame” explain what the political Establishment has been doing to the United States:

Endgame segment: An Introduction to Historical Abuses by the Global Elite

Endgame segment: Battle for the Republic

Endgame segment: How the Bilderberg Group is Secretly Merging the North American Continent


Also read the summary of the book “None Dare Call it Conspiracy,” and the summary of the book “The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline” which explain the long term agendas of the global elite, and see this article that summarizes much other information about the agendas of the globalist establishment.

 by Edward Ulrich, July 15, 2024 See the article page containing an accumulation of many recent articles and videos from various sources at this link.

 by Edward Ulrich, July 10, 2024

This image is from the back of the U.S. dollar bill which is issued by the U.S. Federal Reserve, showing the Masonic all-seeing eye at the top of a pyramid.  “Annuit cœptis” is Latin meaning “He (God) favors our undertakings,” and “Novus ordo seclorum” means “New Order of the Ages.”  Image from Wikipedia.

There are essentially three main schools of thought about who “runs the world,” however only one of them is factually accurate.


The first school of thought which is the only accurate one

By far the most accurate description is that the global elite are about 300 families who privately own and operate the world’s central banks (such as the U.S. Federal Reserve.)  Many of the families are Jewish, however many are not Jewish such as the Rockefeller, Morgan, and Carnegie families who also have part-ownership of the banks, which makes them as much a part of the global elite as their Jewish counterparts.

The documentary “The Capitalist Conspiracy” explains that situation well.  

The most famous of such families are the European Rothschilds, as is explained in this introductory video from the Alex Jones documentary “Endgame.”

Also see the information in this article that explains in detail who the global elite are and what their motivations are.


The second school of thought

Some activists insist on claiming that it is “the Jews” who are the global elite, thus incorrectly implying that it is “all Jews” and “only Jews.”  Many of such activists are “controlled opposition” (link, link and link) who are being instructed to make that claim in order to confuse people and stifle criticism since antisemitism is unpalatable to most people.

Most of the high ranking global elite share the same occultist practices no matter what their professed religion is, and it is not specially “Jewish” members who do so.


The third school of thought

The third school of thought is that simply “wealthy businessmen” or “corporations” run the world or “nobody” runs the world, where it is claimed that there is no “global elite” despite all of the evidence to the contrary including the existence of the privately owned central banks, and many proponents of such a view claim that simply mentioning the role of banks is antisemitic.

The documentary “Zeitgeist” is an example of the political Establishment attempting to falsely claim that “corporations” and thus “the free enterprise system” are the source of corruption in the world, where it then deceptively advocates for the destruction of Christianity and the establishment of essentially a totalitarian New World Order as the supposed “solution.”

This view is no more legitimate than the “flat Earth theory,” and people who espouse the view often have an agenda for doing so and they often attempt to deceptively deflect all of the evidence to the contrary.  (The “flat Earth theory” is essentially Freemasons earning a “merit badge” by creating an impression that large amounts of people will believe any sort of a ridiculous and false concept.)

 by Edward Ulrich, July 3, 2024

Image from Wikipedia.


A “conservative revolution” has recently been happening in some parts of Europe with the election of right wing candidates, and the Establishment media has been attempting to create a perception that it is going to cause a “fascist catastrophe,” such as this article does.  However many European politicians that the media are calling “far right extremists” are in fact usually not extreme at all.

It is possible that the right wing party of the conservative politician Marine Le Pen might be voted into power in an election in France on Sunday, where she has some beneficial platforms such as reducing the amount of immigration, ending the policy of birthright citizenship for illegal migrants, and creating a “national preference” for French citizens in social housing and welfare programs.

Europe has been having terrible problems due to the out of control Islamic immigration that has been happening on that continent (link), which most non-Europeans are unaware of due to a media blackout about that topic. (link)

However Le Pen doesn’t really go far enough with her platform, where for example she isn’t advocating to get France out of the European Union, and she is essentially a social liberal with her stances on issues such as homosexuality and abortion.  Also she is a strong supporter of Israel despite the fact that the country boycotts many of the supposed “far-right” European parties due to being criticized by them. (link)

Additionally I believe that France should eliminate the “Burka Bans” that it has in place since they are contrary to the rights that Western countries supposedly allow their citizens, but more significantly they should be eliminated because such bans are concealing the problem of the encroachment of Islam that is happening in the country.

The speculation about the election of Le Pen’s party is eliciting a violent response from migrants and leftists in general, such as a group of 20 popular French rappers who collaborated on a track calling Le Pen a “whore” and “a dog in heat who should be beat with a stick,” and they threatened the life of the National Party leader Jordan Bardella while also singing, “If the fascists come by, I’m going out with a big caliber.”  This is a good example of how it is much easier to not allow immigration problems to occur in the first place rather than trying to fix them later.

Additionally large mobs of leftists rioted in France when news broke of Le Pen’s party taking the lead in the election, as this article explains.

(Also remember that Europeans are in danger because they are not allowed to carry guns to protect themselves from being attacked by non-law abiding people.  See this link which explains that no civilians are allowed to carry weapons in public places in France, where instead they are required to rely only on “woke” Establishment police officers to protect them.)

Most Europeans are actually naive about politics, and they also often have a neurosis about appearing to be some sort of a “bigot,” which the political Establishment exploits in order to further their harmful goals of destroying Europe as a part of its plan for a totalitarian New World Order. (link and link )

The political Establishment is afraid of Europeans becoming aware of what the terms “left wing” and “right wing” actually mean (link), so they have been doing everything that they can to create a perception that “right wing” means “racism and bigotry,” such as through being deceptive in their media reports and by implementing controlled opposition activist groups (link) who intentionally destroy their own credibility such as by proclaiming that they “like Hitler and Nazis,” etc.

The political Establishment also lied to Europeans about the nature of the migrants that they have been bringing in, such as through the ex-Catholic Nun Karen Armstrong who disseminated incredibly dishonest claims about Islam to Western audiences through the Establishment media over the past few decades.  For example she ridiculously claimed that Islam is no more oppressive or violent than Christianity, among many other deceptions.  See this article explaining a summary of issues with her, and see this information about other issues of Establishment disinformation about Islam.


In order to counter the harmful agendas that are being implemented by the political Establishment, it is important that the following must happen:

— Europeans need to understand that the European Union is deceptively “anti-Democratic” and every European country should remove themselves from their involvement with it. (link)

— People need to become informed about what the phrases “left wing” and “right wing” actually mean. (link)

— People need to be more aware of the corrupting influence of Freemasonry in politics and the media. (link and link)

— People need to be aware of the dangers of controlled opposition activist groups. (link, link, and link)

— People need to become more aware of the harmful aspects of Islam. (link and link)

— People need to become more aware of who the global elite are and what their agendas are. (link and link)

— People need to understand that all electronic vote counting is potentially fraudulent, including the electronic counting of paper ballots. (link)

 by Edward Ulrich, updated July 3, 2024


A new book has been published which ridiculously claims that JFK jr. killed himself, his wife, and his wife’s sister by intentionally crashing his plane into the ocean 25 years ago near Jackie Kennedy’s house where he grew up; however much evidence shows that they were actually assassinated by a flight instructor who was also on the plane, as the above video explains.

The video documentary is by John Hankey, who details the large amount of evidence showing that JFK jr. was assassinated by the plane he was piloting being crashed by a flight instructor who was hypnotized to do it.

[Note that accusations of the involvement of specific individuals in the documentary are speculative, but nonetheless it is obvious that JFK jr. was killed in the manner that is explained.  I recommend sticking with watching it at the beginning as it picks up starting at about 1/3 of the way into it.

Also some of the claims in the documentary about his father JFK sr.’s assassination may sound ridiculous, however the evidence for those claims are laid out in the interesting documentary “JFK II: The Bush Connection,” which was also created by John Hankey.  (Note the link to the video has been changed on July 3, 2024.)]

 by Edward Ulrich, updated June 22, 2024

[Note: June 22, 2024— I have moved this article here from Open Minded Realism.  I had originally published the article on July 18, 2020.

It is important to watch first documentary in this article in its entirety.  The information in it is helpful to be able to fully make sense of much of the other information on this website.  The documentary has been created by the John Birch Society.

As the documentary explains, in a “right wing” society its citizens are able to have a large amount of freedoms because they generally have a high degree of healthy self-control.  A “right wing” government naturally deprives the global elite of being able to consolidate its control over the people, therefore the elite have been tirelessly working to purposely degrade the Western societies in order to give them no choice but to become “left wing” and thus become more dependent on them.

Most Europeans would benefit from learning this information, since the corrupt political Establishment always incorrectly attempts to tell them in their media that “right wing” and “far right” means “racism and bigotry.”  The political Establishment understands that Europeans are generally very healthy and highly functional and thus they would be very happy and compatible living in a right wing society, so the elite has been doing everything that they can to harm Europe (link and link) in order to trick its people into becoming leftists.

Another significant aspect of the documentary is the fact that they correctly identify Nazism as being “left wing” and not “right wing.”  Nazism even has “socialism” in its name, but the corrupt Establishment has been doing everything that it can to try to make people think that it is “right wing.”  (However it is true though that some “neo-Nazis” are right wing because they want the government to leave them alone.)]


Lately I’ve been seeing a lot of information debating what the terms “left wing” and “right wing” actually even mean.

Strictly speaking, “left wing” and “right wing” refers only to a scale of the amount of power of social intervention that a government has, however some people also attempt to lump in other incidental social characteristics such as “liberalism” and “conservatism,” which can sometimes be (somewhat) accurate but definitely not always; therefore two different schools of thought actually exist about the matter.

This article will explain both schools of thought and it will show why the second school of thought is not valid and potentially even dangerous.


The first school of thought which is the most accurate and relevant


When I was younger, I didn’t know much about politics, and whenever I heard the terms left wing and right wing I assumed that it was referring to an arbitrary scale from “liberal” to “conservative,” which I think is what most people still assume.

My understanding of politics has proceeded in stages over the years, where I have been continually learning new information that has been clarifying my view of the world.  One of such significant pieces of information that I learned from is the following documentary “Overview of America” that explains the various types of government systems, and well as explaining how the terms left wing and right wing are actually referring to something that is very tangible and specific:

[Note: July 27, 2023— When this video explains the role of the U.S. government, it is talking about how the Founding Fathers originally intended it to be for the circumstances at that time.  It would not be possible or actually even preferable to revert a lot of the current much more socialist system of the U.S Government back to being that way since society has changed too much since then, but at least its further leftward movement toward Communism could be halted if enough people become well-enough informed.

Also I think some people might be confused when the video says the U.S. is not a “Democracy.”  Technically it is a “democratically elected constitutional Republic,” but it is not a pure “Democracy” which would actually be simply “mob rule” rather than “the rule of law.”]


“Overview of America: Part 1 of 2”

“Overview of America: Part 2 of 2”

After watching the above videos (it is important that you watch them in their entirety), you will be able to understand why the political Establishment doesn’t want people to have a clear understanding of what “left wing” and “right wing” are actually referring to!

(Also see this article that contains a written summary of the videos.)


The second school of thought which is clunky and arbitrary, and potentially even dangerous





Now compare the information in the previous videos with the information in this one, which claims that the terms “left wing” and “right wing” arose because conservatives sat to the right of a French king and liberals sat to the left of him, therefore the terms are actually referring to a scale of “conservative-ness” to “liberal-ness.”  The video then attempts to explain alternative types of scales that supposedly “work better.”

The political Establishment wants people to think that “left wing” means “compassionate and liberal” rather than the truth of it being “enslavement by a tyrannical political elite,” and they want people to think “right wing” means “bigotry and hatred,” in order to trick people into subjugating themselves to the elite’s deceitful and harmful leftist agendas.  Therefore the French King explanation is propagated frequently, including often even being taught in schools by leftist teachers and professors!

 by Edward Ulrich, updated June 23, 2024 [Additional note: June 23, 2024— I have added additional links to this article.]

[Note: June 22, 2024— I have moved this article here from Open Minded Realism and re-written parts for clarity.  The article was originally written on July 25, 2020.]




This 2015 PBS video segment says Marseilles, France is 30-40% Muslim.  And of course 2015 is nine years ago, before the massive wave of immigration that has happened since then!  (Note that the PBS video is pro-immigration, where it claims that immigrants are being verbally abused and it implies that they are being “oppressed,” but actually the opposite is usually the case.)

The video “Muslim Demographics” has been popular since 2009 talking about the situation of the native populations of Europe being increasingly replaced by the incoming populations of mostly Muslim immigrants.

The video supplies a lot of statistics, and debunkers have found minor issues with a few of its facts, yet the premise of the video is sound nonetheless.  See its video page for an examination of issues that a BBC video claims to have found with it.

This video shows the shocking situation outside of the large Calais refugee camp in France in 2015.  The camp was located close to the entry of the Channel Tunnel into England.

I have re-edited this from the original video that I found on the internet.  See its video page at this link.

This video contains a compilation of video footage of the out of control Islamic immigration that is happening in Europe.  See its video page at this link.


[Note: June 22, 2024— The text in this section has been re-written for improved clarity.]

As the above videos explain, Europeans should be frightened of what is being done to them with the uncontrolled Islamic immigration that is happening on that continent.  There is no way to undo the damage that has already happened.  It is mind-boggling that Europeans could have let that happen to themselves, it will be remembered in history as a terrible mistake.

[Note: An additional link has been added here on June 23, 2024— Most Westerners have been purposely kept naive about the harmful aspects of Islam, because the ideology is a conspiracy of the global elite. (link, link, link, and link)]

The global elite have been working to usher in an age of a “post-industrial feudal system” which will essentially be totalitarian Communism, where population sizes are planned to be drastically reduced and most of the remaining people in the world are planned to be turned into a permanent underclass of dysfunctional and dependent “serfs and slaves.”

The elite have specific plans to:

— Mix everyone together.

— Dumb everyone down.

— Impoverish everyone and not allow people to individually prosper so they will be as dependent on the global elite as possible.

— Destroy everyone’s morality, cultural identities, and healthy family structures.

— Depopulate the Earth of as many people as possible.


(Note that the previous link makes a reference to the “Protocols of Zion” document that is often claimed to be one of the most extreme “antisemitic hoaxes” that has ever existed.  However, research has shown that the document most likely actually originated as a Masonic policy brief rather than being a “Jewish” conspiracy.  In any event, it is generally a bad idea to mention it because it is often considered to be a “third rail” that automatically makes whoever mentions it appear to be some sort of an antisemitic lunatic in the eyes of most people.  See this link and this link for more information about that matter.)

The global elite’s agenda has always been to “bring everyone down” by employing a deceitful rationale of supposedly “bringing everyone up.”  One of the methods that they use is to cause as much damage to one segment of society or region of the world as possible, and then to abruptly force the infusion of that damaged segment into a healthy segment by guilting people into allowing it to happen.

The global elite also attempt to make people think that their motives are “white supremacist,” for divisive purposes and to distract from the fact that they are currently also in the process of destroying predominantly white societies.  They are actually “frightened” of native Europeans because such people are generally very healthy, functional, and compassionate, and thus they would be able to very effectively stand up against the harmful agendas of the political Establishment if enough of them actually knew what those agendas are.  [Note: Of course everyone can be compassionate, but my point is since such people have generally been existing in a state of functional health, it often naturally leads to having a compassionate mentality.  By contrast, people who have been trying to survive in a dysfunctional society don’t always have the luxury of developing “spare” compassion to the same degree, although of course everyone is an individual.]

[Additional note: June 22, 2024— Also many non-Europeans have constantly been told by the political Establishment that they are victims of Europeans and “white people,” when in fact the Establishment has always had an agenda of also harming white people.  For example, the same political Establishment historically also killed and enslaved hundreds of millions of white people, such as during the Russian Revolution and in Soviet Russia, as well as during the previous two World Wars. (link)]

Muslim veiled woman in Istanbul, Turkey, October 2013.  The Turkish government banned women who work in the public sector from wearing headscarves.  Image from BigStockPhoto.


People in many parts of the Western world are calling for “burka bans” with the stated intention of improving the lives of the women who are expected to wear them.  However, such agendas are a bad idea for many reasons.

Such legislation is contrary to the basic freedoms that Western countries guarantee for their citizens, and it wouldn’t remove the more fundamental issues of Islam oppressing women’s rights.  In fact it would make problems worse due to it making currently burka-wearing women more comfortable in a superficial sense while concealing the underlying problems.  The head coverings could even be thought of as being “beneficial” under the circumstances due to it being an indicator of the wider problems with Islam in general.

If Western countries think that Islamic clothing is so problematic as to actually make it necessary to go against their supposed principals of individual liberties, then why are they importing so many incompatible Sharia compliant Muslims in the first place?  (See the article “Maps show countries where women’s religious clothing is restricted or mandated by government.)

Often well-meaning people defend and promote the propagation of Islam because they are under the impression that Muslims are merely a misunderstood and persecuted minority, due to information about most of the problems with the ideology being mostly suppressed by the Establishment media.  However, Islam is very different than other religions since conformity to every aspect of it is very often strictly enforced with intimidation and violence, such as in the many Islamic countries where Muslims are executed simply for trying to abandon the religion.  (Also see a collection of links which detail serious problems with Islamic Immigration into the West.)

A problem with Islam is the fact that it propagates itself with extremely high birth rates, with many families having as many as eight children or more, usually at the expense of taxpayers footing the bill in the form of welfare and social services.  (See the video “Muslim Demographics” which explains how Western cultures are in the process of becoming replaced by Islamic ones, and see a segment from the video “Creeping Sharia: The Islamization of the West” which explains what happens to societies during the various stages of becoming replaced.)






There are many ways to effectively fix the problems of Western countries being overloaded with too many migrants from the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) countries.  The following points detail some potential strategies:

— Western countries should coordinate with regions of the world to set up “safe countries” where new potential refugees could safely be relocated where they would naturally be compatible with the populations that are already living there.  For example, Saudi Arabia is a wealthy country yet it has not been accepting ANY refugees while Europe is becoming flooded with totally unvetted migrants from Islamic war zones.

— The programs for importing refugees en mass into Europe and the U.S. should be ceased, and instead their safe passage to the designated countries should be implemented with initial assistance from the Western countries.  Jobs and education should be available for the refugees once they arrive.

— New Muslim migrants should only be relocated to Islamic safe countries, and Sunni Muslims should not be mixed with Shia Muslims in the process since conflict exists between the two sects.

— Once safe and effective relocation for new migrants has been established, the borders should be closed and undocumented immigrants should no longer be allowed into the country.  New undocumented migrants should not be legally allowed to work, and they should not receive welfare or other government benefits other than food and housing before being safely relocated.

— For previous non-citizen immigrants in Europe and the U.S, incentives should be given for them to willingly relocate to the safe countries, such as through the promise of jobs and housing, and ones who are are convicted of crimes should be relocated to a designated safe country ([text addition June 15, 2019— where they would also serve their prison sentence if necessary.])

 by Edward Ulrich, June 20, 2024 An analysis of a survey published by the journal JAMA Pediatrics is claiming that one in four U.S. adolescents in grades 9 through 12 self-identify as non-heterosexual.  JAMA is a weekly peer-reviewed medical journal that is published by the American Medical Association.   Note though that JAMA is an Establishment organization that advocates for “woke” ideologies of all types (link), so it is possible that the results of their study have been somehow biased to achieve a desired outcome.


The report claims the following changes have occurred between 2019 and 2021:


— Youths who identify as heterosexual have decreased from 84.5% to 74.4%.

— Youths who identify as gay or lesbian rose from 2.5% to 3%.

— Youths who identify as bisexual rose from 8.6% to 12%.

— Youths who selected “not sure” rose from 4.4% to 5.1%.

— Females stating they were “not sure” rose from 5.6% to 8%.

— Males stating they were “not sure” fell from 3.3% to 2.3%.


The survey included 12,847 respondents in 2019, and 16,357 respondents in 2021, both with roughly equal numbers of male and female respondents.

The survey is conducted every other year by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (which is also controlled by the political Establishment), where questions about sexual identity have started to be asked in 2015.



The following images are from this Tweet showing the results of a Gallup poll about sexual orientation:

7.2% of Americans overall are claimed to identify as “LGBT.”

19.7% of Generation Z students are claimed to identify as “LGBT.”

A large shift toward bisexuality is claimed to be occurring.

See the article page containing an accumulation of many recent articles and videos from various sources at this link.