by Edward Ulrich, January 15, 2025
In this video Alex Jones explains that the globalist deep state is trying to neuter Donald Trump in the eyes of the public in order to deprive him of the legitimate use of the Military in response to domestic uprisings that they are planning to cause, where they are also likely planning to stage attacks that are meant to be blamed on Trump’s supporters.
Footage is shown of leftist politicians and media such as Kamala Harris and MSNBC publicly fear-mongering before the election that Trump is planning to use the Military against U.S. citizens “who simply disagree with him.”
Jones mentions a recent Politico disinformation article entitled “‘I Think Things Are Going to Be Bad, Really Bad’: The US Military Debates Possible Deployment on US Soil Under Trump” which is at this link.
[Note: The article says that the Insurrection Act has been used throughout U.S. history to the benefit of the nation, however it claims that Trump’s use of it will be different because he will use the military to “threaten the constitutional order,” where he will “actually do it this time” as opposed to during his last administration when he didn’t do it in response to the BLM rioting that occurred.
The article says without justification, “[F]or the first time in memory, ‘we have to consider the possibility we could have a commander-in-chief who is willing to order the military to do something that is pretty threatening to the constitutional order.’”
The article attempts to fear monger about what Trump will do with the military in the U.S., it attempts to create an impression that large amounts of people in the military are very worried about Trump being president for that reason, and it talks about how troops should not obey Trump’s orders such as by ridiculously comparing the situation to the “My Lai Massacre” that happened during the Vietnam war.]
In August, Joe Biden signed an order at the Pentagon to put out a policy paper and manual for domestic military deployment during civil unrest and civil emergencies (which is known as martial law), including authorizing lethal force to be used against rioters or citizens who are engaging in crimes on the ground. The order is also a blueprint to take over communications, the media, and infrastructure in order to implement a total breakdown of society. (See this article about Biden’s order.)
At the time when Biden did that, large amounts of Establishment politicians and media such as Kama Harris, Tim Walz, and Nancy Pelosi publicly came out to warn that Trump will be coming with the military to kill migrants and kill minorities such as black people, without evidence to justify the claim.
The political Establishment has also been pre-programming the public to assume that Trump supporters will be responsible for false flag terrorist attacks that they themselves are planning to implement.
Jones says that the Establishment media is fear mongering that the Insurrection Act will give Trump broad powers for martial law, despite the fact that it was the Establishment who attempted to use it against people like him, Owen Shroyer, and Steve Bannon.
In the year 2020 the Democrats “war gamed” various scenarios where they strategized that they would not accept the results of the election if Trump won, where plans were being made for the Democrat states to secede. (See this article for details.)
In the recent election they were attempting to hype the same type of rhetoric as well, therefore they have been accusing Trump of that sort of behavior due to the political Establishment always blaming the opposition for what they are planning to do.
They also said that they would have uprisings if Trump became president on January 20th in order to try to make Trump call out the military due to their burning the cities, which they would then claim is illegal for him to do.
Before the election the Democrats were saying that if anybody from the Federal Government such as ICE or the Border Patrol arrested illegal aliens, that it would be an illegal use of the military even if it they are only arresting aliens who are criminals such as human smugglers or drug traffickers. However even the Democrat-controlled 9th Circuit Court has recently ruled that Trump has the power to do so.
Biden is now deploying the military in Los Angeles because of the wildfires, and George HW Bush also did it during the LA riots in the 1990’s, which most people agree with in such a limited scope.
The Establishment is planning to stir up trouble to create a civil war. Trump’s agenda is not civil war but rather creating prosperity, freedom, and security. The Establishment is trying to neuter Trump in the minds of people against the legitimate use of the military against the crisis that they have already been saying that they are planning, in order to cause parts of the country to break up.
The Deep State is likely planning to engage in attacks such as massacring groups of people such as migrants in order to blame it on Trump and his supporters. Also leftist governors and mayors have been announcing that they are going to physically fight federal troops when they come to perform deportations. (link and link)
___
Also see this James Perloff article that explains a high likelihood exists for civil strife starting to occur in the U.S. in April of 2025.
This video is from this post on X.CIVIL WAR Alert! The Democratic Party / Deep State Are Publicly Attempting To Strip Trump Of His Constitutional Control Of The US Military As Commander In Chief.
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) January 14, 2025
Frighteningly, at the same time they are trying to strip Trump’s control over the armed forces, they are openly… pic.twitter.com/reiEiaGKsv
In this video Alex Jones explains that the globalist deep state is trying to neuter Donald Trump in the eyes of the public in order to deprive him of the legitimate use of the Military in response to domestic uprisings that they are planning to cause, where they are also likely planning to stage attacks that are meant to be blamed on Trump’s supporters.
Footage is shown of leftist politicians and media such as Kamala Harris and MSNBC publicly fear-mongering before the election that Trump is planning to use the Military against U.S. citizens “who simply disagree with him.”
Jones mentions a recent Politico disinformation article entitled “‘I Think Things Are Going to Be Bad, Really Bad’: The US Military Debates Possible Deployment on US Soil Under Trump” which is at this link.
[Note: The article says that the Insurrection Act has been used throughout U.S. history to the benefit of the nation, however it claims that Trump’s use of it will be different because he will use the military to “threaten the constitutional order,” where he will “actually do it this time” as opposed to during his last administration when he didn’t do it in response to the BLM rioting that occurred.
The article says without justification, “[F]or the first time in memory, ‘we have to consider the possibility we could have a commander-in-chief who is willing to order the military to do something that is pretty threatening to the constitutional order.’”
The article attempts to fear monger about what Trump will do with the military in the U.S., it attempts to create an impression that large amounts of people in the military are very worried about Trump being president for that reason, and it talks about how troops should not obey Trump’s orders such as by ridiculously comparing the situation to the “My Lai Massacre” that happened during the Vietnam war.]
In August, Joe Biden signed an order at the Pentagon to put out a policy paper and manual for domestic military deployment during civil unrest and civil emergencies (which is known as martial law), including authorizing lethal force to be used against rioters or citizens who are engaging in crimes on the ground. The order is also a blueprint to take over communications, the media, and infrastructure in order to implement a total breakdown of society. (See this article about Biden’s order.)
At the time when Biden did that, large amounts of Establishment politicians and media such as Kama Harris, Tim Walz, and Nancy Pelosi publicly came out to warn that Trump will be coming with the military to kill migrants and kill minorities such as black people, without evidence to justify the claim.
The political Establishment has also been pre-programming the public to assume that Trump supporters will be responsible for false flag terrorist attacks that they themselves are planning to implement.
Jones says that the Establishment media is fear mongering that the Insurrection Act will give Trump broad powers for martial law, despite the fact that it was the Establishment who attempted to use it against people like him, Owen Shroyer, and Steve Bannon.
In the year 2020 the Democrats “war gamed” various scenarios where they strategized that they would not accept the results of the election if Trump won, where plans were being made for the Democrat states to secede. (See this article for details.)
In the recent election they were attempting to hype the same type of rhetoric as well, therefore they have been accusing Trump of that sort of behavior due to the political Establishment always blaming the opposition for what they are planning to do.
They also said that they would have uprisings if Trump became president on January 20th in order to try to make Trump call out the military due to their burning the cities, which they would then claim is illegal for him to do.
Before the election the Democrats were saying that if anybody from the Federal Government such as ICE or the Border Patrol arrested illegal aliens, that it would be an illegal use of the military even if it they are only arresting aliens who are criminals such as human smugglers or drug traffickers. However even the Democrat-controlled 9th Circuit Court has recently ruled that Trump has the power to do so.
Biden is now deploying the military in Los Angeles because of the wildfires, and George HW Bush also did it during the LA riots in the 1990’s, which most people agree with in such a limited scope.
The Establishment is planning to stir up trouble to create a civil war. Trump’s agenda is not civil war but rather creating prosperity, freedom, and security. The Establishment is trying to neuter Trump in the minds of people against the legitimate use of the military against the crisis that they have already been saying that they are planning, in order to cause parts of the country to break up.
The Deep State is likely planning to engage in attacks such as massacring groups of people such as migrants in order to blame it on Trump and his supporters. Also leftist governors and mayors have been announcing that they are going to physically fight federal troops when they come to perform deportations. (link and link)
___
Also see this James Perloff article that explains a high likelihood exists for civil strife starting to occur in the U.S. in April of 2025.
News of Interest.TV is a website of quality links to interesting and helpful content. Its goal is to provide access to innovative ideas and to bring positive resolutions.
September 10, 2022 - Continued updating various summary articles.
August 31, 2022 - Created new summary articles from information on Open Minded Realism, and added content to many of the existing summary articles. (See the article directory for indications of what has been updated.)
August 31, 2022 - Improved the format of the article directory.
August 31, 2022 - Created new summary articles from information on Open Minded Realism, and added content to many of the existing summary articles. (See the article directory for indications of what has been updated.)
August 31, 2022 - Improved the format of the article directory.
by Edward Ulrich, January 15, 2025
Image from Wikipedia.
I’m a staunch gun rights supporter, but I’m concerned about “open carry” gun rights that have recently been brought back in many U.S. states as a part of a supposed “conservative rival,” as opposed to what I think are more appropriate “concealed carry” regulations.
Open carrying refers to visibly caring a firearm in public places, as opposed to concealed carry where the firearms cannot be seen by a causal observer. “Carrying” a weapon is not the same as “brandishing” a weapon, which can be a serious crime.
No gun will protect someone from a government’s armed forces, but people need the right to own guns to defend themselves when the government cannot or will not protect them from non-law abiding people.
Many conservatives are automatically in favor of open carry regulations, when in fact it can be problematic due to the fact that Antifa-type leftists and controlled opposition “conservatives” are almost certainly planning to exploit it in a widespread coordinated manner for a number of terrifying reasons— the least of which is to frighten the population into voting to ban guns altogether.
See this article which explains how “end the lockdown” protests were often infiltrated with gun-wielding protesters, for example.
I think the danger is not as great in the most conservative areas of the country, however many of the states that allow open carrying are at risk of such harmful actions being coordinated to occur.
In any event, I also think people should be able to know if they should be concerned if they see someone walking down the street carrying a shotgun or an AR-15, for example.
As of July 2024, 31 states allow open carrying without a permit, and 10 allow open carrying with a permit, according to this article.
States that allow permitless open carry: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
States that allow open carrying with a permit: Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Dakota, Rhode Island, and South Carolina.
Image from Wikipedia.
I’m a staunch gun rights supporter, but I’m concerned about “open carry” gun rights that have recently been brought back in many U.S. states as a part of a supposed “conservative rival,” as opposed to what I think are more appropriate “concealed carry” regulations.
Open carrying refers to visibly caring a firearm in public places, as opposed to concealed carry where the firearms cannot be seen by a causal observer. “Carrying” a weapon is not the same as “brandishing” a weapon, which can be a serious crime.
No gun will protect someone from a government’s armed forces, but people need the right to own guns to defend themselves when the government cannot or will not protect them from non-law abiding people.
Many conservatives are automatically in favor of open carry regulations, when in fact it can be problematic due to the fact that Antifa-type leftists and controlled opposition “conservatives” are almost certainly planning to exploit it in a widespread coordinated manner for a number of terrifying reasons— the least of which is to frighten the population into voting to ban guns altogether.
See this article which explains how “end the lockdown” protests were often infiltrated with gun-wielding protesters, for example.
I think the danger is not as great in the most conservative areas of the country, however many of the states that allow open carrying are at risk of such harmful actions being coordinated to occur.
In any event, I also think people should be able to know if they should be concerned if they see someone walking down the street carrying a shotgun or an AR-15, for example.
As of July 2024, 31 states allow open carrying without a permit, and 10 allow open carrying with a permit, according to this article.
States that allow permitless open carry: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
States that allow open carrying with a permit: Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Dakota, Rhode Island, and South Carolina.
by Edward Ulrich, January 15, 2025
Image from Wikipedia.
Donald Trump is considering declaring a “national economic emergency” in order to provide legal justification for implementing a large swath of tariffs on both allies and adversaries of the United States, where the declaration would allow Trump to construct a new tariff program by using the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), which authorizes a president to manage imports during a national emergency.
This article mentions that issue for example.
I’ve been seeing articles including in the conservative media criticizing Trump’s upcoming potential tariffs, warning about how he will be targeting all imports in addition to specific ones. I don’t think that will necessarily be problematic however and in fact I think it will be beneficial as long as it is implemented properly.
I’m not opposed to the concept of tariffs, but I believe that Trump should implement many of them on a graduated scale that increases over time, where they should start by being somewhat low in many cases and be increased by a set amount each year, in order to give domestic producers time to adjust to best exploit their new beneficial situation. Also that way consumers wouldn’t initially be hit with too excessive of “taxes” due to domestic producers not yet being able to fill the demand, such as with high tech products like computers.
Much of the current debate about the issue centers around the matter of the potential tariffs that will be universal rather than the ones that are specific.
A recent Reuters article explains that Trump is denying recent reports saying that his aides were exploring tariff plans that would only cover critical imports, and the Establishment article also claims that his universal tariffs are “deepening uncertainty among business leaders about future U.S. trade policies.”
The article says the following:
Trump responded on his Truth Social platform after the Washington Post cited three sources familiar with the matter as saying that Trump aides were exploring a narrower approach to tariffs, focused on certain critical sectors.
“The story in the Washington Post, quoting so-called anonymous sources, which don’t exist, incorrectly states that my tariff policy will be pared back. That is wrong. The Washington Post knows it's wrong. It’s just another example of Fake News,” he wrote in a post on Truth Social.
…
Trump, a Republican who takes office on Jan. 20, had vowed to impose tariffs of 10% on global imports into the U.S. along with a 60% tariff on Chinese goods - duties that trade experts say would upend trade flows, raise costs and draw retaliation against U.S. exports. He later said he would impose a 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican imports on his first day in office, which could lead to sharp increases in the cost of gasoline.
As Trump is quoted as saying in the above article, he has been consistent in advocating for tariffs across the board since even before the election. For example this November 2025 AFP article says the following:
On the campaign trail, Trump said he would put in place across-the-board import tariffs of between 10 and 20 percent in a bid to raise revenues, protect domestic industries, and bring jobs back to the United States.
He has also threatened to impose a 60 percent tariff on Chinese goods, and even floated a 200 percent-plus levy on cars made in Mexico.
“To me ‘tariff’ is a very beautiful word,” he said in a recent Fox News interview. “It’s a word that’s going to make our country rich again.”
Trump “has made no mystery of the fact that he’s deeply enamored with tariffs as a policy tool,” Kimberly Clausing, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) told AFP on Tuesday, adding she thought he would put in place large tariffs if elected.
… The above article from the French news agency AFP (link) is very critical of his agenda however, making the following claims:
If enacted, these policies will undoubtedly have a significant impact on US and international trade, rerouting the flow of goods and reshaping international economic ties.
But while they may raise some revenues, they will also hit US businesses and consumers hard, according to a recent paper by the Tax Foundation nonprofit.
If imposed, Trump's proposed tariff increases would raise taxes on businesses by another $524 billion annually, shrink GDP by at least 0.8 percent, and reduce employment by close to 700,000 full-time equivalent jobs, the researchers estimated.
“I think it’s just sort of a very quick way to shoot the US economy in the foot, if not the leg,” said Clausing, a former deputy assistant secretary for Tax Analysis in the US Treasury Department during the Biden Administration.
… I don’t believe the above claims that are critical of the agenda, however.
Critics of tariffs usually try to avoid mentioning the fact that the regulations strongly encourage domestic production that is very beneficial for the economy, but rather they only talk about it being a “tax on consumers.” (Presumably the domestic producers will raise their prices somewhat as well however because it would only make sense for them to do so, but nonetheless the money will remain in the U.S. economy.)
Personally I think even the universal tariffs would be beneficial, since most products that can be imported can also be created domestically, including even most agricultural products. (However there are issues with agricultural crops where much of it in the U.S. is GMO due to lax regulations, whereas imported crops are often more appropriately not genetically modified, as this article talks about.)
Much of the effectiveness of Trump’s tariffs hinges on how “genuine” he is with his motivations of bringing production back to the United States, where otherwise the tariffs could in fact be problematic.
Image from Wikipedia.
Donald Trump is considering declaring a “national economic emergency” in order to provide legal justification for implementing a large swath of tariffs on both allies and adversaries of the United States, where the declaration would allow Trump to construct a new tariff program by using the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), which authorizes a president to manage imports during a national emergency.
This article mentions that issue for example.
I’ve been seeing articles including in the conservative media criticizing Trump’s upcoming potential tariffs, warning about how he will be targeting all imports in addition to specific ones. I don’t think that will necessarily be problematic however and in fact I think it will be beneficial as long as it is implemented properly.
I’m not opposed to the concept of tariffs, but I believe that Trump should implement many of them on a graduated scale that increases over time, where they should start by being somewhat low in many cases and be increased by a set amount each year, in order to give domestic producers time to adjust to best exploit their new beneficial situation. Also that way consumers wouldn’t initially be hit with too excessive of “taxes” due to domestic producers not yet being able to fill the demand, such as with high tech products like computers.
Much of the current debate about the issue centers around the matter of the potential tariffs that will be universal rather than the ones that are specific.
A recent Reuters article explains that Trump is denying recent reports saying that his aides were exploring tariff plans that would only cover critical imports, and the Establishment article also claims that his universal tariffs are “deepening uncertainty among business leaders about future U.S. trade policies.”
The article says the following:
Trump responded on his Truth Social platform after the Washington Post cited three sources familiar with the matter as saying that Trump aides were exploring a narrower approach to tariffs, focused on certain critical sectors.
“The story in the Washington Post, quoting so-called anonymous sources, which don’t exist, incorrectly states that my tariff policy will be pared back. That is wrong. The Washington Post knows it's wrong. It’s just another example of Fake News,” he wrote in a post on Truth Social.
…
Trump, a Republican who takes office on Jan. 20, had vowed to impose tariffs of 10% on global imports into the U.S. along with a 60% tariff on Chinese goods - duties that trade experts say would upend trade flows, raise costs and draw retaliation against U.S. exports. He later said he would impose a 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican imports on his first day in office, which could lead to sharp increases in the cost of gasoline.
As Trump is quoted as saying in the above article, he has been consistent in advocating for tariffs across the board since even before the election. For example this November 2025 AFP article says the following:
On the campaign trail, Trump said he would put in place across-the-board import tariffs of between 10 and 20 percent in a bid to raise revenues, protect domestic industries, and bring jobs back to the United States.
He has also threatened to impose a 60 percent tariff on Chinese goods, and even floated a 200 percent-plus levy on cars made in Mexico.
“To me ‘tariff’ is a very beautiful word,” he said in a recent Fox News interview. “It’s a word that’s going to make our country rich again.”
Trump “has made no mystery of the fact that he’s deeply enamored with tariffs as a policy tool,” Kimberly Clausing, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) told AFP on Tuesday, adding she thought he would put in place large tariffs if elected.
… The above article from the French news agency AFP (link) is very critical of his agenda however, making the following claims:
If enacted, these policies will undoubtedly have a significant impact on US and international trade, rerouting the flow of goods and reshaping international economic ties.
But while they may raise some revenues, they will also hit US businesses and consumers hard, according to a recent paper by the Tax Foundation nonprofit.
If imposed, Trump's proposed tariff increases would raise taxes on businesses by another $524 billion annually, shrink GDP by at least 0.8 percent, and reduce employment by close to 700,000 full-time equivalent jobs, the researchers estimated.
“I think it’s just sort of a very quick way to shoot the US economy in the foot, if not the leg,” said Clausing, a former deputy assistant secretary for Tax Analysis in the US Treasury Department during the Biden Administration.
… I don’t believe the above claims that are critical of the agenda, however.
Critics of tariffs usually try to avoid mentioning the fact that the regulations strongly encourage domestic production that is very beneficial for the economy, but rather they only talk about it being a “tax on consumers.” (Presumably the domestic producers will raise their prices somewhat as well however because it would only make sense for them to do so, but nonetheless the money will remain in the U.S. economy.)
Personally I think even the universal tariffs would be beneficial, since most products that can be imported can also be created domestically, including even most agricultural products. (However there are issues with agricultural crops where much of it in the U.S. is GMO due to lax regulations, whereas imported crops are often more appropriately not genetically modified, as this article talks about.)
Much of the effectiveness of Trump’s tariffs hinges on how “genuine” he is with his motivations of bringing production back to the United States, where otherwise the tariffs could in fact be problematic.
by Edward Ulrich, January 13, 2025
This article contains information explaining aspects of the situation with the Los Angeles wildfires, where the federal, state and local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the situation, including through their withholding of fire mitigation procedures and through leftist Antifa-type terrorists setting the fires.
It is explained that the motivation for causing the fires is to destroy neighborhoods in order to rebuild by implementing a UN Agenda 21 “smart city,” among other reasons.
Also explained are the ridiculous “woke” agendas of the Los Angeles Fire department, how the LA’s mayor Karen Bass is a Marxist Communist, and how leftists are attempting to blame the fires on supposed “global warming.”
Video: Alex Jones explains how the federal, state & local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the worst fires in Los Angeles history
Alex Jones explains much proof that the federal, state, and local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the fires that are occurring in Los Angeles which are the worse in its history, where it is being done by design in order to help implement the UN’s Agenda 21 which is intended to collapse society and create a totalitarian post-industrial world.
Following are points made in the video:
— Donald Trump has been accusing Governor Newsom of “incompetence” with his handling of the fire, however the reality is more insidious where the truth is that the fires are premeditated sabotage as a war on the people.
— In addition to arsonists starting fires (spoken about more in detail on another video on this article), electricity to power lines was often not turned off in order to create additional fires where they fell.
— LA is claiming that they have lost control of their emergency alert system.
— LA announced in late December 2024 that they had suspended the annual testing of the fire hydrants for the fiscal year of 2024.
— A reservoir in the Palisades that holds 117 million gallons of water was empty and offline for maintenance.
— Insurance companies pulled out of the area in the last few months, where they dropped the policies of many California homeowners, citing the fact that there wasn’t enough fire mitigation being implemented by the city such as the brush not adequately being cut. [Note: How can they be allowed to do that? It’s not the property owner’s fault. The companies should have sued the city and state instead.]
— The U.S. Forest Service had ceased prescribed burns in California, ridiculously claiming it was a “precautionary measure” to ensure the availability of staff and equipment for potential real wildfires.
— Homeowners whose houses have been destroyed that no longer have fire insurance will be expected to sell their properly for pennies on the dollar through the implementation of eminent domain, in order empower planned totalitarian “smart cities.”
— Big environmental preserves that are close to the cities have been spared from the fires due to proper planning and fire management, being locations where globalist billionaires have their own easements where they live in lavish mansions.
— Gavin Newsom cut $100 million from the California fire prevention budget, where the budget of every local fire department was reduced by 20% and the money was given to empower corrupt leftist agendas, such as being sent to Ukraine.
— Is had been widely reported last year that necessary brush inspections in the area have lagged.
— Despite neglecting to spend money on fire prevention, the state spends enormous amounts of money on welfare for illegal aliens. It is estimated that the yearly federal expenditures for such welfare including hospital bills is more than $150 billion.
— Establishment figures such as Klaus Schwab, King Charles, and Gretta Thunberg have been claiming that man-made climate change is the cause of the fires, where they been using it as an excuse to implement their society-destroying globalist agendas.
— Previously in Maui, Hawaii, it was proposed to implement “smart city” agendas but it wasn’t accepted, so a year later Maui was burned to the ground. The same is also now happening in Los Angeles due to a “SmartLA 2028” agenda that is being planned to be implemented.
— Biden is pledging 100% federal aid for the fires by claiming it is being caused by climate change, thus making the entire country pay the bill for the California Democrat’s intentional fires.
— Antifa-type leftists who are starting the fires are motivated by “class envy,” where they hate people who have even a little more money than they do. The political Establishment channels the energy of such lazy degenerates in society and gives them power over others in order to exploit their shortcomings as a weapon.
— Such an agenda of the global elite is called “scorched Earth,” which has been implemented throughout history such as when Russia burned St. Petersburg to the ground in order to deprive Napoleon of the city when he invaded.
— The part of LA that is being burned out is one of the most expensive areas, where it borders areas where generally poor people live who are not willing to sell their property.
— Historically in the U.S. when mineral strikes and fossil fuels were discovered near populated areas the elite would come in and burn the towns down, including killing the inhabitants, such as what happened in Pinkerton, Colorado in 1914. (link)
— Footage is shown of Kalus Shwab giving a speech in the United Arab Emirates where he said people in Los Angeles will use Uber-like apps to summon self-driving cars, where by 2030 Los Angeles will be free of privately driven cars, which will “allow to transform highways into parks and public spheres.”
— In the 2023 / 2024 Los Angeles budget they had a surplus of funds for firefighting, and in 2024 / 2025 a surplus also existed, however the money was allocated elsewhere in order to empower corrupt leftist agendas.
— Gavin Newsom is incredibly corrupt. Democrat cities and Democrat states are all bankrupt and they are dragging down the rest of the country, such as what California is doing with its use of federal emergency funds. Those areas must be liberated or they will bring the entire country down.
Video: Arsonists are confirmed to have set multiple fires that led to the Los Angeles wildfires, while state & federal Democrats blocked fire mitigation to ensure the firestorm’s success
Following is a description of the video:
Alex Jones explains that the fires in Los Angeles are the result of arson, where all of the fire mitigation programs have intentionally been removed and the fires are being started by leftist Antifa-type environmental terrorists.
Jones mentions the UN’s “Rewilding project” that was put into treaties in 1992, (link and link) where some of its goals are to eliminate farming, get rid of coal powered plants, and cut off access to water.
Federal, State and Local authorities who are operating under such UN regulations are intentionally eliminating fire mitigation programs, which Donald Trump has criticized in the past.
Firebreaks would be easy and inexpensive to create, and they could also be used as access roads by people, which the UN does not like. Biden has also been blocking controlled burns over the past few years.
The Mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass who is overseeing the destruction of the city is a card-carrying Communist who has been working for Cuba.
Many people who are involved in the harmful activities that are occurring are compartmentalized and they don’t understand the big picture of what is happening.
The political Establishment has been removing all of the necessary services that stabilize civilization in order to usher in their totalitarian post-industrial world, such as by compromising the supply of food, water, energy, medicine, education, culture, turning off the infrastructure, and defunding the police; while at the same time they are increasing taxes.
The Establishment has also been encouraging woke identity politics mentalities in people for the ulterior motive of setting a precedent to discriminate, such as through the upcoming social credit score system.
What is happening is an admitted administrative shutdown of civilization in order to trigger a collapse and depopulate the planet.
Video: The Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass is a card-carrying Marxist Communist
[Note a video that is included in this episode contains a strange anti-Christian expletive embedded within it. All of the information in this video is summarized below.]
This video explains that the seemingly ridiculously incompetent Mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass is actually a card-carrying Marxist Communist who has a decades-long history of being involved with a Cuban Marxist terrorist group known as “the Venceremos Brigade,” which was used to subvert American interests, weaken democracies, and spread Communism around the world.
It is explained that the group attracted the most radicalized and delusional segments of American leftists starting in the 1960’s, where all of its members were required to be Marxist-Leninists, and it trained its members in terrorist tactics and guerrilla warfare including making bombs.
Also mentioned is an all-woman domestic terrorist group known as M-19 that was also radicalized by the Venceremos Brigade. M-19 was founded in 1978 and it robbed armored trucks, abetted prison breaks, bombed an FBI office, bombed the Israel Aircraft Industries building, bombed the African Consulate in New York, bombed Fort McNair in Washington D.C., and it bombed the north wing of the U.S. Capitol building.
Karen Bass who is now Mayor of Los Angeles actually led the South Los Angeles Venceremos Brigade.
The political Establishment has been attempting to blame the Los Angeles fires on global warming
Joe Biden’s excuse for bailing out the cost of the fires using federal funds is because he is blaming it on “global warming.” (link) See this article that explains how the supposed man-caused climate change issue is a corrupt hoax.
See the following articles:
An Infowars article explains that the FEMA chief is claiming that climate change is to blame for the California wildfires (link)
A Breitbart article explains that the Democrat Massachusetts Senator Ed Markley is claiming that the Los Angeles fires are the result of a climate change “disaster” stoked by Trump’s embrace of “big oil” (link)
Politico disinformation article: “‘Half the Country’s Thinking Magically’: California Fire Victims Grapple with the Political Paralysis Over Climate Change” (link)
Democracy Now disinformation article: “Climate Scientist Peter Kalmus Fled L.A. Fearing Wildfires. His Old Neighborhood Is Now a Hellscape” (link)
Truthdig disinformation article: “Yes, Human-Caused Climate Change Contributed to the Burning of Los Angeles” (link)
Mother Jones disinformation article: “What We’re Missing About the Cause of the LA Wildfires” (link)
This article contains information explaining aspects of the situation with the Los Angeles wildfires, where the federal, state and local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the situation, including through their withholding of fire mitigation procedures and through leftist Antifa-type terrorists setting the fires.
It is explained that the motivation for causing the fires is to destroy neighborhoods in order to rebuild by implementing a UN Agenda 21 “smart city,” among other reasons.
Also explained are the ridiculous “woke” agendas of the Los Angeles Fire department, how the LA’s mayor Karen Bass is a Marxist Communist, and how leftists are attempting to blame the fires on supposed “global warming.”
Video: Alex Jones explains how the federal, state & local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the worst fires in Los Angeles history
Alex Jones explains much proof that the federal, state, and local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the fires that are occurring in Los Angeles which are the worse in its history, where it is being done by design in order to help implement the UN’s Agenda 21 which is intended to collapse society and create a totalitarian post-industrial world.
Following are points made in the video:
— Donald Trump has been accusing Governor Newsom of “incompetence” with his handling of the fire, however the reality is more insidious where the truth is that the fires are premeditated sabotage as a war on the people.
— In addition to arsonists starting fires (spoken about more in detail on another video on this article), electricity to power lines was often not turned off in order to create additional fires where they fell.
— LA is claiming that they have lost control of their emergency alert system.
— LA announced in late December 2024 that they had suspended the annual testing of the fire hydrants for the fiscal year of 2024.
— A reservoir in the Palisades that holds 117 million gallons of water was empty and offline for maintenance.
— Insurance companies pulled out of the area in the last few months, where they dropped the policies of many California homeowners, citing the fact that there wasn’t enough fire mitigation being implemented by the city such as the brush not adequately being cut. [Note: How can they be allowed to do that? It’s not the property owner’s fault. The companies should have sued the city and state instead.]
— The U.S. Forest Service had ceased prescribed burns in California, ridiculously claiming it was a “precautionary measure” to ensure the availability of staff and equipment for potential real wildfires.
— Homeowners whose houses have been destroyed that no longer have fire insurance will be expected to sell their properly for pennies on the dollar through the implementation of eminent domain, in order empower planned totalitarian “smart cities.”
— Big environmental preserves that are close to the cities have been spared from the fires due to proper planning and fire management, being locations where globalist billionaires have their own easements where they live in lavish mansions.
— Gavin Newsom cut $100 million from the California fire prevention budget, where the budget of every local fire department was reduced by 20% and the money was given to empower corrupt leftist agendas, such as being sent to Ukraine.
— Is had been widely reported last year that necessary brush inspections in the area have lagged.
— Despite neglecting to spend money on fire prevention, the state spends enormous amounts of money on welfare for illegal aliens. It is estimated that the yearly federal expenditures for such welfare including hospital bills is more than $150 billion.
— Establishment figures such as Klaus Schwab, King Charles, and Gretta Thunberg have been claiming that man-made climate change is the cause of the fires, where they been using it as an excuse to implement their society-destroying globalist agendas.
— Previously in Maui, Hawaii, it was proposed to implement “smart city” agendas but it wasn’t accepted, so a year later Maui was burned to the ground. The same is also now happening in Los Angeles due to a “SmartLA 2028” agenda that is being planned to be implemented.
— Biden is pledging 100% federal aid for the fires by claiming it is being caused by climate change, thus making the entire country pay the bill for the California Democrat’s intentional fires.
— Antifa-type leftists who are starting the fires are motivated by “class envy,” where they hate people who have even a little more money than they do. The political Establishment channels the energy of such lazy degenerates in society and gives them power over others in order to exploit their shortcomings as a weapon.
— Such an agenda of the global elite is called “scorched Earth,” which has been implemented throughout history such as when Russia burned St. Petersburg to the ground in order to deprive Napoleon of the city when he invaded.
— The part of LA that is being burned out is one of the most expensive areas, where it borders areas where generally poor people live who are not willing to sell their property.
— Historically in the U.S. when mineral strikes and fossil fuels were discovered near populated areas the elite would come in and burn the towns down, including killing the inhabitants, such as what happened in Pinkerton, Colorado in 1914. (link)
— Footage is shown of Kalus Shwab giving a speech in the United Arab Emirates where he said people in Los Angeles will use Uber-like apps to summon self-driving cars, where by 2030 Los Angeles will be free of privately driven cars, which will “allow to transform highways into parks and public spheres.”
— In the 2023 / 2024 Los Angeles budget they had a surplus of funds for firefighting, and in 2024 / 2025 a surplus also existed, however the money was allocated elsewhere in order to empower corrupt leftist agendas.
— Gavin Newsom is incredibly corrupt. Democrat cities and Democrat states are all bankrupt and they are dragging down the rest of the country, such as what California is doing with its use of federal emergency funds. Those areas must be liberated or they will bring the entire country down.
Video: Arsonists are confirmed to have set multiple fires that led to the Los Angeles wildfires, while state & federal Democrats blocked fire mitigation to ensure the firestorm’s success
Following is a description of the video:
Alex Jones explains that the fires in Los Angeles are the result of arson, where all of the fire mitigation programs have intentionally been removed and the fires are being started by leftist Antifa-type environmental terrorists.
Jones mentions the UN’s “Rewilding project” that was put into treaties in 1992, (link and link) where some of its goals are to eliminate farming, get rid of coal powered plants, and cut off access to water.
Federal, State and Local authorities who are operating under such UN regulations are intentionally eliminating fire mitigation programs, which Donald Trump has criticized in the past.
Firebreaks would be easy and inexpensive to create, and they could also be used as access roads by people, which the UN does not like. Biden has also been blocking controlled burns over the past few years.
The Mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass who is overseeing the destruction of the city is a card-carrying Communist who has been working for Cuba.
Many people who are involved in the harmful activities that are occurring are compartmentalized and they don’t understand the big picture of what is happening.
The political Establishment has been removing all of the necessary services that stabilize civilization in order to usher in their totalitarian post-industrial world, such as by compromising the supply of food, water, energy, medicine, education, culture, turning off the infrastructure, and defunding the police; while at the same time they are increasing taxes.
The Establishment has also been encouraging woke identity politics mentalities in people for the ulterior motive of setting a precedent to discriminate, such as through the upcoming social credit score system.
What is happening is an admitted administrative shutdown of civilization in order to trigger a collapse and depopulate the planet.
Video: The Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass is a card-carrying Marxist Communist
[Note a video that is included in this episode contains a strange anti-Christian expletive embedded within it. All of the information in this video is summarized below.]
This video explains that the seemingly ridiculously incompetent Mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass is actually a card-carrying Marxist Communist who has a decades-long history of being involved with a Cuban Marxist terrorist group known as “the Venceremos Brigade,” which was used to subvert American interests, weaken democracies, and spread Communism around the world.
It is explained that the group attracted the most radicalized and delusional segments of American leftists starting in the 1960’s, where all of its members were required to be Marxist-Leninists, and it trained its members in terrorist tactics and guerrilla warfare including making bombs.
Also mentioned is an all-woman domestic terrorist group known as M-19 that was also radicalized by the Venceremos Brigade. M-19 was founded in 1978 and it robbed armored trucks, abetted prison breaks, bombed an FBI office, bombed the Israel Aircraft Industries building, bombed the African Consulate in New York, bombed Fort McNair in Washington D.C., and it bombed the north wing of the U.S. Capitol building.
Karen Bass who is now Mayor of Los Angeles actually led the South Los Angeles Venceremos Brigade.
The political Establishment has been attempting to blame the Los Angeles fires on global warming
Joe Biden’s excuse for bailing out the cost of the fires using federal funds is because he is blaming it on “global warming.” (link) See this article that explains how the supposed man-caused climate change issue is a corrupt hoax.
See the following articles:
An Infowars article explains that the FEMA chief is claiming that climate change is to blame for the California wildfires (link)
A Breitbart article explains that the Democrat Massachusetts Senator Ed Markley is claiming that the Los Angeles fires are the result of a climate change “disaster” stoked by Trump’s embrace of “big oil” (link)
Politico disinformation article: “‘Half the Country’s Thinking Magically’: California Fire Victims Grapple with the Political Paralysis Over Climate Change” (link)
Democracy Now disinformation article: “Climate Scientist Peter Kalmus Fled L.A. Fearing Wildfires. His Old Neighborhood Is Now a Hellscape” (link)
Truthdig disinformation article: “Yes, Human-Caused Climate Change Contributed to the Burning of Los Angeles” (link)
Mother Jones disinformation article: “What We’re Missing About the Cause of the LA Wildfires” (link)
by Edward Ulrich, January 11, 2025
Images from mapsland.com and Wikipedia.
In a manner that is unfortunately typical of Donald Trump’s annoying “gaffes,” he said that he was not going to rule out the use of military force to acquire Greenland and the Panama Canal for the U.S., which of course the media has been reporting about by portraying him as being an “irrational out of control authoritarian.” However such a response seems to be what Trump was intending to happen.
As reported in this AP article, Trump said about the matter:
“‘I’m not going to commit to that,’ Trump said, when asked if he would rule out the use of the military. ‘It might be that you’ll have to do something. The Panama Canal is vital to our country.’ He added, ‘We need Greenland for national security purposes.’
Even some Establishment media outlets are conceding that Trump’s hostile statement is only “bluster” that shouldn’t be taken seriously, for example this BBC article speculates that his intention is likely only to get Denmark to boost Greenland’s security in the face of the threat of both Russia and China seeking influence in the region.
Anyone who is familiar with Trump knows that he almost certainly doesn’t actually have any intention of using military force in such a manner, but rather he was likely only looking to create a media soundbite claiming that he wants to do that. Remember that Trump is ultimately controlled by the same people who control all Presidents, (link) where such “gaffes” are presumably intentional to make sure that he doesn’t become too popular.
Despite that annoying aspect of Trump, he is much preferable to the Democrats nonetheless. An interesting contrast is the fact that Trump usually “lies” to make himself less popular, whereas Democrats lie to make themselves more popular. The lies of Democrats are much more egregious and harmful as well.
Anastasio Somoza said the following about Marxists in his book “Nicaragua Betrayed,” as is summarized in this chapter summary:
The Communist philosophy is to lie, cheat, steal, or kill as long as it furthers the goal of world domination, which is rapidly being achieved. Marxists have a common ideology, whereas free nations each follow their own course while being mostly oblivious that their common denominator is individual liberty.
Democrat politicians are certainly Marxists, as much of the information in this website explains, including the information at this link.
(Also remember that Republican Neocons and RINOs are hardcore leftists as well, who pretend to be “right wing” in order to get away with it. See this article that explains the true meaning of “left wing” and “right wing.”)
About the issue with Panama
Panama is in fact being exploitative of the United States as Trump is saying, where Jimmy Carter inappropriately singed a treaty in 1978 to hand over control of it in order to empower the Marxist agendas of the global elite.
This article explains that Trump said the following:
“When President Jimmy Carter foolishly gave [the Panama Canal] away, for One Dollar, during his term in Office, it was solely for Panama to manage, not China, or anyone else,” Trump continued. “It was likewise not given for Panama to charge the United States, its Navy, and corporations, doing business within our Country, exorbitant prices and rates of passage. Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama by the U.S. This complete ‘rip-off’ of our Country will immediately stop.”
This article explains the following about the situation:
As things stand, the Panama Canal is legally owned by the government of Panama, but that ownership is not entirely unconditional. The Carter-Torrijos Treaties contain “neutrality” guarantees that, if violated, could present a legal justification for challenging Panamanian ownership.
Otherwise, the government of Panama could voluntarily sell the canal back to the U.S. government. Unlike the complex situation at the turn of the 20th Century, there would be no doubt such a voluntary deal was legitimate and properly respected Panamanian sovereignty — assuming, of course, the Panamanians accepted whatever offer the United States made. It seems unlikely Panama could sell the canal to any other country, given the guarantees made to the U.S. in the Carter-Torrijos Treaties.
It would be great if the U.S. were to buy back the Panama Canal, and Rep. Dusty Johnson of South Dakota has introduced a bill that would authorize Trump to do so, as this article explains. However Trump’s vague threat of military actions to acquire it are concerning, where Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino has “ruled out any possible discussions” with Trump regarding the U.S. taking control of the Panama Canal or about “any reduction in the transit fees imposed to U.S. ships,” as the article also mentions.
This article explains that Mulino has said there is “nothing to talk about” with Trump, where he also claims, “The Canal is not under direct or indirect control, neither by China, nor by the European Community, nor by the United States, nor by any other power. As a Panamanian, I strongly reject any manifestation that distorts this reality.” Additionally he claimed that the rates are not established on a whim, where he said, “They are established publicly and in an open hearing, taking into account market conditions, international competition, operating costs, and the maintenance and modernization needs of the interoceanic route.”
There are reasons to be skeptical of Mulino’s claims that Panama is not under the control of Marxist governments however. Make sure to see this information that details what Anastasio Somoza wrote about the matter in 1980, a few years after Carter singed the treaty to hand over control of the Canal. (Or better yet read the entire summary of that chapter at this link, which includes explaining the interesting “Famous Twelve” episode.)
About the issue with Greenland
Trump is saying that he is interested in the U.S. acquiring Greenland for national defense purposes, for its mineral wealth, and to be used as an additional shipping route.
Greenland’s naturally frigid temperatures can also be used to cool computers in enormous data centers, such as for cryptocurrency mining and for more efficiently cooling supercomputers that require extremely cold temperatures to run. (link and link) See this article which explains that cryptocurrency mining in the neighboring country of Iceland is so widespread for that reason that it uses more energy than the homes in that country.
Of course the idea of “taking Greenland by force” is ridiculous, however acquiring Greenland from Denmark would be very beneficial if it could actually happen. Despite Trump’s hostile statement about the issue, obviously nothing will happen with Greenland unless the people want it to happen, and even then it would be unlikely.
See this article that speculates about the actual value of Greenland.
Denmark had previously said that it is not interested in selling Greenland, (link) a French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot is saying he considers Greenland to be “a territory of the European Union,” (link) and Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte Egede is calling for Greenland to seek independence from the Kingdom of Denmark, also saying, “We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.” (link)
(Also not surprisingly the Establishment media has been deceitfully attempting to reinforce the false claim that “man-caused climate change is real” by claiming that Trump wants Greenland because the supposed “global warming-related retreating sea ice” has opened up a northern shipping route, as this article and this article claim for example. Trump may in fact want Greenland because of a northern sea route, but the sea ice has not been retreating due to climate change as this video and this article explain.)
Images from mapsland.com and Wikipedia.
In a manner that is unfortunately typical of Donald Trump’s annoying “gaffes,” he said that he was not going to rule out the use of military force to acquire Greenland and the Panama Canal for the U.S., which of course the media has been reporting about by portraying him as being an “irrational out of control authoritarian.” However such a response seems to be what Trump was intending to happen.
As reported in this AP article, Trump said about the matter:
“‘I’m not going to commit to that,’ Trump said, when asked if he would rule out the use of the military. ‘It might be that you’ll have to do something. The Panama Canal is vital to our country.’ He added, ‘We need Greenland for national security purposes.’
Even some Establishment media outlets are conceding that Trump’s hostile statement is only “bluster” that shouldn’t be taken seriously, for example this BBC article speculates that his intention is likely only to get Denmark to boost Greenland’s security in the face of the threat of both Russia and China seeking influence in the region.
Anyone who is familiar with Trump knows that he almost certainly doesn’t actually have any intention of using military force in such a manner, but rather he was likely only looking to create a media soundbite claiming that he wants to do that. Remember that Trump is ultimately controlled by the same people who control all Presidents, (link) where such “gaffes” are presumably intentional to make sure that he doesn’t become too popular.
Despite that annoying aspect of Trump, he is much preferable to the Democrats nonetheless. An interesting contrast is the fact that Trump usually “lies” to make himself less popular, whereas Democrats lie to make themselves more popular. The lies of Democrats are much more egregious and harmful as well.
Anastasio Somoza said the following about Marxists in his book “Nicaragua Betrayed,” as is summarized in this chapter summary:
The Communist philosophy is to lie, cheat, steal, or kill as long as it furthers the goal of world domination, which is rapidly being achieved. Marxists have a common ideology, whereas free nations each follow their own course while being mostly oblivious that their common denominator is individual liberty.
Democrat politicians are certainly Marxists, as much of the information in this website explains, including the information at this link.
(Also remember that Republican Neocons and RINOs are hardcore leftists as well, who pretend to be “right wing” in order to get away with it. See this article that explains the true meaning of “left wing” and “right wing.”)
About the issue with Panama
Panama is in fact being exploitative of the United States as Trump is saying, where Jimmy Carter inappropriately singed a treaty in 1978 to hand over control of it in order to empower the Marxist agendas of the global elite.
This article explains that Trump said the following:
“When President Jimmy Carter foolishly gave [the Panama Canal] away, for One Dollar, during his term in Office, it was solely for Panama to manage, not China, or anyone else,” Trump continued. “It was likewise not given for Panama to charge the United States, its Navy, and corporations, doing business within our Country, exorbitant prices and rates of passage. Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama by the U.S. This complete ‘rip-off’ of our Country will immediately stop.”
This article explains the following about the situation:
As things stand, the Panama Canal is legally owned by the government of Panama, but that ownership is not entirely unconditional. The Carter-Torrijos Treaties contain “neutrality” guarantees that, if violated, could present a legal justification for challenging Panamanian ownership.
Otherwise, the government of Panama could voluntarily sell the canal back to the U.S. government. Unlike the complex situation at the turn of the 20th Century, there would be no doubt such a voluntary deal was legitimate and properly respected Panamanian sovereignty — assuming, of course, the Panamanians accepted whatever offer the United States made. It seems unlikely Panama could sell the canal to any other country, given the guarantees made to the U.S. in the Carter-Torrijos Treaties.
It would be great if the U.S. were to buy back the Panama Canal, and Rep. Dusty Johnson of South Dakota has introduced a bill that would authorize Trump to do so, as this article explains. However Trump’s vague threat of military actions to acquire it are concerning, where Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino has “ruled out any possible discussions” with Trump regarding the U.S. taking control of the Panama Canal or about “any reduction in the transit fees imposed to U.S. ships,” as the article also mentions.
This article explains that Mulino has said there is “nothing to talk about” with Trump, where he also claims, “The Canal is not under direct or indirect control, neither by China, nor by the European Community, nor by the United States, nor by any other power. As a Panamanian, I strongly reject any manifestation that distorts this reality.” Additionally he claimed that the rates are not established on a whim, where he said, “They are established publicly and in an open hearing, taking into account market conditions, international competition, operating costs, and the maintenance and modernization needs of the interoceanic route.”
There are reasons to be skeptical of Mulino’s claims that Panama is not under the control of Marxist governments however. Make sure to see this information that details what Anastasio Somoza wrote about the matter in 1980, a few years after Carter singed the treaty to hand over control of the Canal. (Or better yet read the entire summary of that chapter at this link, which includes explaining the interesting “Famous Twelve” episode.)
About the issue with Greenland
Trump is saying that he is interested in the U.S. acquiring Greenland for national defense purposes, for its mineral wealth, and to be used as an additional shipping route.
Greenland’s naturally frigid temperatures can also be used to cool computers in enormous data centers, such as for cryptocurrency mining and for more efficiently cooling supercomputers that require extremely cold temperatures to run. (link and link) See this article which explains that cryptocurrency mining in the neighboring country of Iceland is so widespread for that reason that it uses more energy than the homes in that country.
Of course the idea of “taking Greenland by force” is ridiculous, however acquiring Greenland from Denmark would be very beneficial if it could actually happen. Despite Trump’s hostile statement about the issue, obviously nothing will happen with Greenland unless the people want it to happen, and even then it would be unlikely.
See this article that speculates about the actual value of Greenland.
Denmark had previously said that it is not interested in selling Greenland, (link) a French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot is saying he considers Greenland to be “a territory of the European Union,” (link) and Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte Egede is calling for Greenland to seek independence from the Kingdom of Denmark, also saying, “We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.” (link)
(Also not surprisingly the Establishment media has been deceitfully attempting to reinforce the false claim that “man-caused climate change is real” by claiming that Trump wants Greenland because the supposed “global warming-related retreating sea ice” has opened up a northern shipping route, as this article and this article claim for example. Trump may in fact want Greenland because of a northern sea route, but the sea ice has not been retreating due to climate change as this video and this article explain.)
by Edward Ulrich, January 8, 2025
Part 1 of 2 of the documentary “Praying for Armageddon” which details the Christian Zionism movement in the U.S. See part 2 of 2 at this link.
I generally don’t like the Establishment-run Al Jazeera news outlet, but I thought this two part documentary entitled “Praying for Armageddon” that is critical of the Christian Zionism movement is interesting, where it profiles apparently popular Christian preachers who essentially admit that they want the end of the world to occur, and it also profiles U.S. politicians who espouse the Christian Zionism movement as well.
The documentary explains that many of such Christians are attempting to force the “End Times” to occur by bringing about a world-ending catastrophe by helping to foment a third World War through their support of Zionism.
However the documentary does not get into discussing the fact that the attitudes of such people are covertly being influenced the the global elite; and I noticed in the second part that they attempted to equate the term “Christian Zionist” with “Christian Nationalist,” however those are not the same thing.
While it is not mentioned in the documentary, it is interesting that all of the signs that Christian Zionists say are prophesied to precede the Apocalypse are covertly being engineered by the Illuminati global elite, such as the rise of Islamic extremism. (link and link)
Of course not all Christians (including not all Protestants) have such attitudes. And note that most denominations including Catholicism have also been compromised by the global elite in other ways. (link and link)
Some of the more notorious Christian Zionist politicians are Lindsey Graham who had been advocating for importing Jihadists from Afghanistan into the U.S. (link, link, and link) while at the same time he has been advocating for the use of nuclear weapons on Palestine, (link) which the Republican Congressman and ex-Pastor Tim Walberg also advocates for. (link)
[Note: Trump has a lot of issues such as explained in this documentary, but Harris would have been much worse because the Democrats would ultimately have been just as much of Zionist war hawks, but with them also implementing their intentionally harmful anti-American agendas. (link, link, and link)
Another reason why Harris would have been much worse is because it is very acceptable in the mainstream media to criticize Trump, while criticizing Harris would not have been considered acceptable because she is a Democrat and a black woman. Even the monster Joe Biden was never criticized in the media simply because he is a Democrat! Could you imagine the sort of kid gloves that Harris would have been treated with? Don’t ever vote for a Democrat.
I think it is disappointing that polls say 79 percent of Jewish people in the U.S. voted for Harris. (link) According to the linked article many Jews are saying that they didn’t want to vote for Trump because of his extreme pro-Zionist stances.
Unfortunately however it is reasonable to only assume that most of the Jewish voters for Harris want open borders in the West (but not in Israel), (link) where many of them may also be planning to eventually move to Israel.
(Incidentally I don’t understand why any Christian would even want the Rapture to occur, because every Christian goes to Heaven after they die anyway, but if the Rapture happens it would effectively “damn every non-Christian at that point in time to Hell” and presumably “damn everyone born after that point in time to Hell” as well, at least as I understand the Biblical writings about the matter. Additionally chaos would supposedly happen on Earth at the moment that happens, for example presumably cars and planes that are being driven by Christians would crash and harm people. I think if that is the case then if anything people including Christians should instead be doing whatever they can to make sure that the Rapture doesn’t happen.)]
___
Also listen to this interview of James Perloff where he explains much evidence showing that the Christian Zionism movement has been engineered behind the scenes by the global elite, such as through the “Scofield Reference Bible” being created with the covert influence of the political Establishment. [Note the discussion gets in-depth and occasionally they speak about issues that some claim are antisemitic. For example they briefly discuss an issue about a few passages in Jewish Talmudic scripture that are hostile towards non-Jews. I prefer not to focus on such issues because I see it as being unfair to modern Jews who mostly don’t take that seriously. I do think it is acceptable for such information to at least be mentioned however.]
Part 1 of 2 of the documentary “Praying for Armageddon” which details the Christian Zionism movement in the U.S. See part 2 of 2 at this link.
I generally don’t like the Establishment-run Al Jazeera news outlet, but I thought this two part documentary entitled “Praying for Armageddon” that is critical of the Christian Zionism movement is interesting, where it profiles apparently popular Christian preachers who essentially admit that they want the end of the world to occur, and it also profiles U.S. politicians who espouse the Christian Zionism movement as well.
The documentary explains that many of such Christians are attempting to force the “End Times” to occur by bringing about a world-ending catastrophe by helping to foment a third World War through their support of Zionism.
However the documentary does not get into discussing the fact that the attitudes of such people are covertly being influenced the the global elite; and I noticed in the second part that they attempted to equate the term “Christian Zionist” with “Christian Nationalist,” however those are not the same thing.
While it is not mentioned in the documentary, it is interesting that all of the signs that Christian Zionists say are prophesied to precede the Apocalypse are covertly being engineered by the Illuminati global elite, such as the rise of Islamic extremism. (link and link)
Of course not all Christians (including not all Protestants) have such attitudes. And note that most denominations including Catholicism have also been compromised by the global elite in other ways. (link and link)
Some of the more notorious Christian Zionist politicians are Lindsey Graham who had been advocating for importing Jihadists from Afghanistan into the U.S. (link, link, and link) while at the same time he has been advocating for the use of nuclear weapons on Palestine, (link) which the Republican Congressman and ex-Pastor Tim Walberg also advocates for. (link)
[Note: Trump has a lot of issues such as explained in this documentary, but Harris would have been much worse because the Democrats would ultimately have been just as much of Zionist war hawks, but with them also implementing their intentionally harmful anti-American agendas. (link, link, and link)
Another reason why Harris would have been much worse is because it is very acceptable in the mainstream media to criticize Trump, while criticizing Harris would not have been considered acceptable because she is a Democrat and a black woman. Even the monster Joe Biden was never criticized in the media simply because he is a Democrat! Could you imagine the sort of kid gloves that Harris would have been treated with? Don’t ever vote for a Democrat.
I think it is disappointing that polls say 79 percent of Jewish people in the U.S. voted for Harris. (link) According to the linked article many Jews are saying that they didn’t want to vote for Trump because of his extreme pro-Zionist stances.
Unfortunately however it is reasonable to only assume that most of the Jewish voters for Harris want open borders in the West (but not in Israel), (link) where many of them may also be planning to eventually move to Israel.
(Incidentally I don’t understand why any Christian would even want the Rapture to occur, because every Christian goes to Heaven after they die anyway, but if the Rapture happens it would effectively “damn every non-Christian at that point in time to Hell” and presumably “damn everyone born after that point in time to Hell” as well, at least as I understand the Biblical writings about the matter. Additionally chaos would supposedly happen on Earth at the moment that happens, for example presumably cars and planes that are being driven by Christians would crash and harm people. I think if that is the case then if anything people including Christians should instead be doing whatever they can to make sure that the Rapture doesn’t happen.)]
___
Also listen to this interview of James Perloff where he explains much evidence showing that the Christian Zionism movement has been engineered behind the scenes by the global elite, such as through the “Scofield Reference Bible” being created with the covert influence of the political Establishment. [Note the discussion gets in-depth and occasionally they speak about issues that some claim are antisemitic. For example they briefly discuss an issue about a few passages in Jewish Talmudic scripture that are hostile towards non-Jews. I prefer not to focus on such issues because I see it as being unfair to modern Jews who mostly don’t take that seriously. I do think it is acceptable for such information to at least be mentioned however.]
by Edward Ulrich, January 8, 2025
This documentary “Israelism: How Young American Jews’ Views of Israel Are Shifting” explains how many American Jews who have traditionally been pro-Israel are becoming disillusioned due to the conflict in Palestine, where many are now gravitating to leftist activist groups that are opposed to the conflict.
[Note: Since this documentary is from the pro-Establishment Vice media outlet I had rather low expectations about it which turned out to be correct.
I wouldn’t trust the activist groups that are profiled in the documentary to actually be very effective, where for example they most likely don’t allow communicating about the most significant truths of the matter such as Hamas being operated by the global elite (link) and the October 7th attacks being an inside job. (link)
Also the documentary does not address the issues of widespread extremist attitudes of Palestinians and many other Muslims, (link and link) and it attempts to create an impression that “white supremacy” is the most significant threat to both Jews and Palestinians!
The Vice media outlet also created this documentary that deceptively attempts to advocate for the spread of Islam in Latin America.]
This documentary “Israelism: How Young American Jews’ Views of Israel Are Shifting” explains how many American Jews who have traditionally been pro-Israel are becoming disillusioned due to the conflict in Palestine, where many are now gravitating to leftist activist groups that are opposed to the conflict.
[Note: Since this documentary is from the pro-Establishment Vice media outlet I had rather low expectations about it which turned out to be correct.
I wouldn’t trust the activist groups that are profiled in the documentary to actually be very effective, where for example they most likely don’t allow communicating about the most significant truths of the matter such as Hamas being operated by the global elite (link) and the October 7th attacks being an inside job. (link)
Also the documentary does not address the issues of widespread extremist attitudes of Palestinians and many other Muslims, (link and link) and it attempts to create an impression that “white supremacy” is the most significant threat to both Jews and Palestinians!
The Vice media outlet also created this documentary that deceptively attempts to advocate for the spread of Islam in Latin America.]
by Edward Ulrich, January 8, 2025
This is part one of a three part documentary “The Secret History of Al Qaeda” which explains how the terrorist organization Al Qaeda was covertly associated with the Western political Establishment. The video also contains a Q&A section with its creators.
Among other issues, this episode explains the British agenda of covertly controlling the Middle East since the 1800’s, but note that it doesn’t acknowledge the fact that the Iranian Revolution that happened in 1979 was the work of covert British and U.S. activity, which the book “Hostage to Khomeini” explains in detail.
See the other two parts of this documentary at this link.
Also see this article which is a summary of 9/11 related issues.
This is part one of a three part documentary “The Secret History of Al Qaeda” which explains how the terrorist organization Al Qaeda was covertly associated with the Western political Establishment. The video also contains a Q&A section with its creators.
Among other issues, this episode explains the British agenda of covertly controlling the Middle East since the 1800’s, but note that it doesn’t acknowledge the fact that the Iranian Revolution that happened in 1979 was the work of covert British and U.S. activity, which the book “Hostage to Khomeini” explains in detail.
See the other two parts of this documentary at this link.
Also see this article which is a summary of 9/11 related issues.
by Edward Ulrich, January 8, 2025
Recently the state of Louisiana has been attempting to mandate that the Christian Ten Commandments must be displayed in every public school classroom, (link) being emboldened by recent Supreme Court rulings that nullify previous rulings that required the separation of church and state. (link)
The law has since been put on hold due to a lawsuit that is calling the law “unconstitutional on its face” and “not neutral toward religion.” (link)
National Republicans including President Trump have supported the law, where Trump wrote on social media that “[Posting the Ten Commandments] in public schools, private schools and many other places [could be the] first major step in the revival of religion, which is desperately needed, in our country.” Other states such as Texas are attempting to do the same as Louisiana is doing.
I think mandating that the Ten Commandments are displayed in public school classrooms should definitely be thought of as being inappropriate due to it being the government forcing religion upon students.
How would people who support that law think about other religions or sects of Christianity that they don’t belong to being imposed upon their kids in a similar manner?
Supporters of allowing religion in public schools point out that the First Amendment of the Constitution does not “prohibit” religion, but rather it does not “impede” it. (link) The Constitution was written to guarantee people their God-given rights, (link) and it was also written based on Christian values even though Christianity was not specifically mentioned.
Recent Supreme Court rulings that have nullified the previous policy of the separation of church and state are also having consequences that many Christians have not anticipated, such as enabling the establishment of Islamic prayer rooms in schools, (link and link) as well as enabling “after-school Satan clubs” in schools. (link)
While I’m all in favor of the propagation of Christian values, I think the separation of church and state is an essential tenant of a free society. If people want their religion to be a part of their school they should go to a private school that caters to it.
Is it reasonable to think that the Louisiana politicians really even have “good intentions” with their legislation? I don’t think so. I think if they actually meant well they would have mandated that the the Bill of Rights be displayed instead.
.jpg){kind=link}
The law has since been put on hold due to a lawsuit that is calling the law “unconstitutional on its face” and “not neutral toward religion.” (link)
National Republicans including President Trump have supported the law, where Trump wrote on social media that “[Posting the Ten Commandments] in public schools, private schools and many other places [could be the] first major step in the revival of religion, which is desperately needed, in our country.” Other states such as Texas are attempting to do the same as Louisiana is doing.
I think mandating that the Ten Commandments are displayed in public school classrooms should definitely be thought of as being inappropriate due to it being the government forcing religion upon students.
How would people who support that law think about other religions or sects of Christianity that they don’t belong to being imposed upon their kids in a similar manner?
Supporters of allowing religion in public schools point out that the First Amendment of the Constitution does not “prohibit” religion, but rather it does not “impede” it. (link) The Constitution was written to guarantee people their God-given rights, (link) and it was also written based on Christian values even though Christianity was not specifically mentioned.
Recent Supreme Court rulings that have nullified the previous policy of the separation of church and state are also having consequences that many Christians have not anticipated, such as enabling the establishment of Islamic prayer rooms in schools, (link and link) as well as enabling “after-school Satan clubs” in schools. (link)
While I’m all in favor of the propagation of Christian values, I think the separation of church and state is an essential tenant of a free society. If people want their religion to be a part of their school they should go to a private school that caters to it.
Is it reasonable to think that the Louisiana politicians really even have “good intentions” with their legislation? I don’t think so. I think if they actually meant well they would have mandated that the the Bill of Rights be displayed instead.
search
Enter keywords to search articles on News of Interest.TV using the DuckDuckGo search engine.
This article speculates about the potential of “open carry” regulations being exploited by the political Establishment in order to implement agendas such as frightening the public into banning guns altogether.
Donald Trump is considering declaring a “national economic emergency” in order to provide legal justification for implementing a large swath of tariffs on both allies and adversaries of the United States, where the declaration would allow Trump to construct a new tariff program by using the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), which authorizes a president to manage imports during a national emergency.
This article contains information explaining aspects of the situation with the Los Angeles wildfires, where the federal, state and local Democrat party is intentionally responsible for the situation, including through their withholding of fire mitigation procedures and through leftist Antifa-type terrorists setting the fires.
In a manner that is unfortunately typical of Donald Trump’s annoying “gaffes,” he said that he was not going to rule out the use of military force to acquire Greenland and the Panama Canal for the U.S., which of course the media has been reporting about by portraying him as being an “irrational out of control authoritarian.” However such a response seems to be what Trump was intending to happen.
This two part documentary entitled “Praying for Armageddon” profiles apparently popular Christian preachers who essentially admit that they want the end of the world to occur, and it also profiles U.S. politicians who espouse the Christian Zionism movement as well.
This documentary “Israelism: How Young American Jews’ Views of Israel Are Shifting” explains how many American Jews who have traditionally been pro-Israel are becoming disillusioned due to the conflict in Palestine, where many are now gravitating to leftist activist groups that are opposed to the conflict.
This is part one of a three part documentary “The Secret History of Al Qaeda” which explains how the terrorist organization Al Qaeda was covertly associated with the Western political Establishment. The video also contains a Q&A section with its creators.
Recently the state of Louisiana has been attempting to mandate that the Christian Ten Commandments must be displayed in every public school classroom, being emboldened by recent Supreme Court rulings that nullify previous rulings that required the separation of church and state.
Joe Biden commuted the death sentences of 37 of 40 people on federal death row two days before Christmas, where their punishments had been downgraded to life imprisonment.
Jimmy Carter has died at age 100, and the media is lionizing him as being a particularly “moral” and “righteous” president, however the reality is very different.
Carter was one the most harmful of presidents, where the global elite exploited his seemingly “friendly and innocent nature” by using him as a puppet to cause damage across the world by betraying allies of the United States.
Carter was one the most harmful of presidents, where the global elite exploited his seemingly “friendly and innocent nature” by using him as a puppet to cause damage across the world by betraying allies of the United States.
Thousands of leftists throughout the U.S. and the rest of the world have been publicly fawning over Luigi Mangione, who allegedly shot and killed the CEO of a health insurance company on the street in New York City in early December, where he is now widely being treated as a “folk hero” for the murder including on mainstream television shows.
However, the behavior of his supporters is so irrational and ridiculous that it brings into question the legitimacy of their actions, where they seem to be engaging in a form of artificially coordinated gaslighting.
However, the behavior of his supporters is so irrational and ridiculous that it brings into question the legitimacy of their actions, where they seem to be engaging in a form of artificially coordinated gaslighting.
Both the UK and Australia will soon be requiring biometric ago verification for users of many social media platforms by utilizing systems such as AI facial recognition, purportedly in order to ensure that younger users do not have access to those platforms.
The number of babies born in the EU has dropped to a record low last year, which has been a decline of 5.5% since the previous year. The number of births last year was the lowest in the EU countries since such data was first collected in 1961.
This article explains why Canadians would become much more free if their country were to become a part of the United States.
In a story that is perhaps as strange as Michelle Obama being a man, much evidence shows that Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is actually the son of Cuba’s Communist dictator Fidel Castro.
Justin Trudeau’s father Pierre Trudeau was the Prime Minister of Canada during the 1970’s and 1980’s, and he was a known Marxist Communist who along with his wife Margaret Trudeau were close friends with Fidel Castro.
Justin Trudeau’s father Pierre Trudeau was the Prime Minister of Canada during the 1970’s and 1980’s, and he was a known Marxist Communist who along with his wife Margaret Trudeau were close friends with Fidel Castro.
This article summarizes a book that explains how the previous Prime Minister of Canada Pierre Trudeau (the father of the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau) was an extreme Marxist Communist, how he had appointed many extreme Communists to his administration, and how he had secretively been advancing many extreme Communist groups and agendas during his administration.
Anastasio Somoza, the popular democratically elected leader of Nicaragua between 1967 and 1979 published his autobiography in 1980, where he detailed how his country was overrun by Communist Sandinistas during his administration. In the book he also explained how the Sandinistas were covertly supported by the globalist political Establishment that was associated with Jimmy Carter’s administration.
This article summarizes every time either Cuba or Fidel Castro were mentioned in the book.
This article summarizes every time either Cuba or Fidel Castro were mentioned in the book.
This video by John Hankey explains that Israel was behind the October 7th attacks through funding, enabling, and partaking in it.
This article explains how the Hamas terrorist group was initially created by Israel as a controlled opposition organization, and how it has remained under the control of the global elite throughout its history.
This article explains that more activists who criticize the conflict in Palestine should be acknowledging the fact that Hamas is ultimately controlled by the global elite.
Alex Jones explains the insane cult mentality of many leftist women who harm themselves in ways such as sterilizing themselves and cutting their breasts off.
This Infowars Greg Reese video explains that Donald Trump and many people coming into his administration had been at the forefront of advocating for the useless and dangerous Covid vaccines.
This Last American Vagabond video talks about issues such as Joe Biden’s migrant child trafficking operations, issues with Trump’s cabinet picks, and issues with an ICC ruling about Israel’s genocide in Palestine, among other issues.
In this 2011 Infowars video Webster Tarpley speaks about the genocidal agendas of Obama’s administration including from his science advisor John Holdren, and he talks about the elite’s agendas of depopulation and deindustrialization where he gives a good explanation of the elite’s plans for their New World Order. Links to purchase his books are presented as well.
This article explains issues with a guest that Tucker Carlson had on his show who made false claims the Holocaust.
This article explains Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) which intents to reduce wasteful spending in the U.S government, and it also details an economic philosophy that could be followed which would be the most effective path to prosperity.
It is often claimed that it is possible to treat cancer by consuming foods that contain a compound known as Nitrilosides, however the claim is disputed by many people in the medical establishment. This article explains how Nitrilosides are claimed to eliminate cancer, and it explains how it would be possible to definitively prove the effectiveness of using it as a treatment.
This video clip from the Len Horowitz film “In Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood, and Bioterrorism” shows the claims of a government sponsored propaganda documentary giving misleading and dishonest information about the United States Government’s involvement in bioterrorism research, and it then explains the genuine history of such programs and shows how they have led to the creation of diseases such as AIDS.
Alex Jones speaks with Len Horowitz, the author of “Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola— Nature, Accident or Intentional?”, discussing issues during the international outbreak of Swine Flu in 2009. Horowitz is an authority in the fields of public health, behavioral science, emerging diseases, and natural healing. Discussed is evidence that the flu outbreak was intentionally created for the purpose of profiting drug companies, empowering globalist agendas, forwarding depopulation agendas, and being used as a “smokescreen” to distract the populace from other issues.
Alex Jones talks with former surgeon and pharmaceutical company abuse activist Rebecca Carley, speaking about many issues associated with the dangers inherent in the use of vaccines. Topics discussed include the many reasons to believe that the 2009 release of Bird Flu was intentional, legislation currently on the books which allows the U.S. Department of Defense to use unknowing human subjects for testing of biological weapons, ostracisations of doctors who speak out against the pharmaceutical industry, the Obama Administration’s allocation of a half a billion dollars for “genomic programs” which tamper with the human DNA structure, and other issues.
This article explains the discovery of vaccines being contaminated with the deadly Avian Flu virus being distributed to 18 countries by the American company Baxter, and it details how the circumstances of the contaminations show that it did not happen by accident.
This article examines aspects of scientific claims making up the theory that Nitrilosides are able to prevent cancerous tumors from forming and are also able to kill cancer cells that already exist. It presents a summary of the theory of how Nitrilosides eliminate cancer as well as presenting scientific studies which support and also counter the theory.
This article examines long-term “Globalist Establishment” political agendas that have been advancing seamlessly over many decades of presidential administrations.
This article contains video clips from the Alex Jones documentary film “Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement” that explains the long-term agendas of Establishment groups who secretively control the governments of the world. It explains how the global political elite is in the process of consolidating the countries of the world into a one world government that is run by unelected private bankers, and it explains their agendas of eugenics and world depopulation through the use of genocidal methods.
Tens of millions of people are living in the United States who are not in the country legally, and they continue to arrive in increasing numbers as the country accomodates them.
The book The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline, written by James Perloff in 1988, chronicles American history during most of the 20th century, examining major national and international events occurring during each of the Presidential administrations by focusing on the activities of the Establishment elite running the secretive and powerful political organization the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
”None Dare Call it Conspiracy” by Gary Allen and Larry Abraham is a book of great importance, having upset the ruling Western political Establishment by exposing much of their secretive underlying history and agendas that control the political processes of the United States and much of the rest of the world. The book was light-years ahead of its time when it was published in 1971. The information in the book is surprising and it can even seem far-fetched to the uninitiated, however the information is accurate and well documented.
This article is a directory of various Islam related articles that are contained on News of Interest.TV and other websites. It is continually updated.
25 Islamic countries have anti-apostasy laws that criminalize leaving the religion of Islam, and many more also have anti-blasphemy laws that criminalize speech or actions that are insulting to the religion.
This article is a collection of information which explains that the Masonic organization “The Muslim Brotherhood” plays a large part in exploiting Muslims to turn them into unwitting tools of the global elite for causing chaos intended to help bring about the New World Order.
This multi-part summary article examines all aspects of the global warming debate, including scientific claims about the effects of the warming, potential causes of the warming, motives behind global warming legislation, and issues with the media and many Establishment environmental groups.
This section directory contains articles that examine each of the major claims about potential detrimental effects related to global warming, including melting ice and sea level issues, storm intensity issues, potential of the spread of disease and human deaths, and plant and animal species extinction.
The findings may surprise you, as most commonly assumed effects of global warming are shown to usually be extremely exaggerated and in many cases completely false.
The findings may surprise you, as most commonly assumed effects of global warming are shown to usually be extremely exaggerated and in many cases completely false.
This section directory contains articles examining treaties and legislation associated with climate change such as the Kyoto Protocol, “Cap and Trade” legislation, and the 2009 “Framework Convention on Climate Change.” It is shown that the implementation of such measures are meant to further long-range objectives of global elite individuals and organizations such as the United Nations, while actually having little or nothing to do with helping the environment.
This section directory contains articles and video clips that help to describe issues of bias that are common in the scientific community that are used to exaggerate the causes and effects of global warming.
This article summarizes the documentary video “Global Warming or Global Governance?” by Michael Coffman of Sovereignty International, presenting video segments from the video with descriptions and transcripts where appropriate.
The documentary examines the science and motives behind claims of the effects of global warming being extreme and created mostly by man’s activities, and it shows how such claims are frequently exaggerated for deceptive and dangerous globalist agendas.
The documentary examines the science and motives behind claims of the effects of global warming being extreme and created mostly by man’s activities, and it shows how such claims are frequently exaggerated for deceptive and dangerous globalist agendas.
“Sterling engine” type solar power generators are the most efficient and inexpensive method for harnessing solar energy, and they have many benefits over centralized large scale solar installations that often cause serious harm to birds. A powerful personal solar power Sterling engine can easily supply all of the energy that is needed by a home. This article explains the mechanism of such devices and explains ideal potential implementations of them.
This video demonstrates a type of solar energy collector called a “Sterling Engine,” which is the most efficient way to generate electricity from the sun. It works by a reflective parabolic dish concentrating sunlight onto a hydrogen filled engine which contains a piston that is powered by the heat of the concentrated sunlight.
The wasteful and heavily government subsidized Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating Plant which opened in California’s Mojave desert in 2014 has brutally incinerated as many as 28,000 birds per year at the rate of ten per hour, but engineers are claiming that their efforts have supposedly reduced the amount of birds killed to two per hour. Nonetheless, even if the claim of the kills being reduced is true, it is still too many and the ineffective plant should be shut down.
Flywheel Batteries are a new and efficient means of storing energy using a mechanical method rather than a chemical one. They consist of a heavy metal disc floating and spinning on a cushion of magnetism in a vacuum housing as a means of storing and distributing energy.
This video describes aspects of the major types of government and economic systems that exist in the world, and it explains why the system of a capitalistic constitutional republic as outlined in the United States Constitution is preferable to other types of systems.
The 38 page booklet “Restoring the Rights of the States and the People” explains how the political system of the United States has migrated away from following the structure that has been specified in the U.S. Constitution, and it explains how elements of the current political system could be moved toward being restored to their original Constitutional principals.
A website has been launched for FederalizeVotingStandards.org, an organization that advocates for eliminating the use of electronic voting machines along with federalizing the standard of how votes are cast and counted to ensure the use of one foolproof voting method in all states.
With Diebold voting machines, every vote is stored on a memory card along with additional computer code. This video clip from the HBO special “Hacking Democracy” shows how an election can be altered through a person only having access to a memory card. The video shows how the hack works even with Diebold machines that only tabulate paper ballots, and how it is impossible to detect the fraud once it has happened.
This article contains information about the subject of atmospheric chemtrail spraying by making use of video documentaries, timelapse video clips, news reports, audio interviews, and photographs.
This documentary film created by Clifford Carnicom details evidence of chemtrail spraying operations, explains grass-roots attempts of discovering what is being sprayed, and it explains numerous reasons the government may have for engaging in such operations. This is an abbreviated version of the film.
View a variety of timelapse footage of heavy chemtrail spraying over York, Pennsylvania on July 23, 2007. This clip shows examples of characteristics common with chemtrails, including abruptly broken chemtrail segments, trailing liquid vapors, and resulting chemtrail haze with shadows of new chemtrails on that haze.
This article examines each of the steps in a problem solving process for peacefully creating political change in the United States through the use of communication and legislation— by using a process of defining a political problem, then defining a goal state with the problem eliminated, and then finding the most efficient processes of communication for reaching the goal state through the use of the legislative process.
This article is a study of potential types of politically motivated communication styles and the practical voting results arising due to such communication, by means of graphing theoretical voting results.
Communication style can be “communicative” to win the support of those being communicated with, or “solidifying” which entrenches people’s opinions on both sides of an issue. This article describes aspects of the two styles and conducts a theoretical study of the practical voting results of the styles being used against each other. It is shown by graphing theoretical voting results that effective “communicative” style will always trump the effects of “solidifying” style.
Communication style can be “communicative” to win the support of those being communicated with, or “solidifying” which entrenches people’s opinions on both sides of an issue. This article describes aspects of the two styles and conducts a theoretical study of the practical voting results of the styles being used against each other. It is shown by graphing theoretical voting results that effective “communicative” style will always trump the effects of “solidifying” style.
This summary article explains why most media outlets don’t accurately report information about important political realities. Topics include explaining who the people are that most control the media, as well as their reasons, means, and methods of controlling it.
The Documentary “Behind the Big News” examines issues of corruption in the mainstream media of the United States, explaining how the powerful and secretive Establishment group The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has had a tremendous influence in biasing news that all mainstream media outlets disseminate. Conflicts of interest exist due to the fact the most major figures in the media are members of the CFR, which is also the most influential organization in formulating the foreign policy of the United States. The CFR has agendas of perpetuating globalist agendas which are often deceptive and little understood by the general public, and it often makes use of its control over the media in order to generate uncritical support for such agendas.
This video clip from the documentary “Behind the Big News” explains Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) connections to the anti-WTO movement which are meant to ensure continued propagation of globalist agendas.
This video compilation from the Alex Jones documentary Police State II: The Takeover shows how demonstrations at the 1999 World Trade Organization (WTO) meetings in Seattle during the Clinton Adminstration were infiltrated by violent provocateurs sent by government groups in order to give law enforcement personnel an excuse to attack and suppress the peaceful legitimate protesters.
Video of the violence perpetrated by the group of over 30 government sponsored provocateurs is shown, followed by evidence including local news reports that shows how the group was housed and protected by law enforcement officials during the week of the demonstrations.
Video of the violence perpetrated by the group of over 30 government sponsored provocateurs is shown, followed by evidence including local news reports that shows how the group was housed and protected by law enforcement officials during the week of the demonstrations.
This video clip from the documentary “Behind the Big News” explains how a publicity stunt created by gun disarmament advocates for an event called the “Million Mom March” used deceptive techniques for creating an illusion in the media of having more popular support than it actually had.
This article explains many benefits of the cultivation and use of the hemp plant.
This article explains issues with water shortages in the United States, and it details theoretical concepts of facilitating the collection of rainwater that falls on active agricultural fields through the deployment of retractable rainwater collection surfaces during times of rain.
This article details issues with the river systems in the United States, and it details a theoretical concept of harvesting river water for irrigating cropland.
Stars of the MTV Television show “The Hills” Spencer Pratt and Heidi Montag speak with Alex Jones, explaining how they have recently woken up to many of the realities of the New World Order which Alex speaks about on his show and in his documentary films.
“If you do what you’ve always done, you’ll get what you’ve always gotten.” View quotes by the self-improvement guru Tony Robbins.
View images of works from the Chicago Based Graffiti Group You Are Beautiful, taken from their website.